In the Sengoku era the school served a second warrior court: the Later Hōjō at Odawara, whose patronage kept the Tsunahiro line forging hitatsura for the uchigatana age until the castle fell to Hideyoshi in 1590.
This is a signed Hirazukuri Wakizashi by Masamune from the Muromachi period. It features a wide blade with a nagasa of 39.1cm and a sori of 1.0cm. The blade weighs 291g and has a motohaba of 3.09cm and kasane of 0.55cm.
NihontoWatchmei · Muromachi · nagasa 39.1cm · sori 1cm
Soshu (Sagami) · Sagami · around 1288-1293
Fujishiro Sai-jo saku · Tōken Taikan top 1%
The published sources place Masamune of Sagami among the disciples of Shintogo Kunimitsu, the three smiths Yukimitsu, Norishige and Masamune who further emphasized chikei, kinsuji and nie within the Soshu tradition (Soshu-den) that Kunimitsu had founded, and led it toward completion. Masamune in particular, the NBTHK writes, handled several kinds of steel of differing carbon content with skill, and, by bringing the subtleties of nie to their highest refinement, did much to elevate the artistic quality of the Japanese sword. Among the three the same notes return again to a single judgment: that his ji and ha are "the most refined"[[c:1]], and that he stands at the very summit of the tradition.
The characteristic manner the published descriptions assign to him is a midareba whose main tone is notare, over which the temper rises intensely active: the nie becomes dense and breaks and clots, kinsuji leap and move, nie that spills into the ji forms yubashiri, and conspicuous chikei are woven throughout the jigane. This, the sources say, is a richly varied manner that may be called "Masamune's own invention"[[c:2]], and they return to one image for it: the impression of viewing haboku (破墨) splashed-ink landscape painting. The forging is itame mixed with mokume, with a standing tendency in places, ji-nie thick and chikei frequent; the boshi runs midare-komi, at times flame-like on one face. It is in this freedom that "the exquisiteness of nie"[[c:3]] reaches its limit.
The published record describes his work in two broad modes: one that, like Norishige, appears to take its models from old Ko-Hoki and Ko-Bizen pieces, and the notare-based nie mode above. Where his manner approaches Norishige the notes mark the kinship plainly, writing of one blade whose large chikei and thick yubashiri "recall the matsukawa-hada"[[c:4]] of Etchu Norishige; yet on close examination, the same source records, the jigane shows neither the blackish tone nor the clouded iron color of Norishige, the nie surpasses his in brilliance, and the nakago, tapering toward the tip rather than flared at the kurijiri, decides the appraisal for Masamune.
As to form, the published sources record that his katana run either to standard mihaba with chu-kissaki or to a broader width with a slightly extended chu-kissaki, while his tanto tend to the eight-sun range with shallow uchizori. From these points his principal period is reckoned the late Kamakura period, the lower limit reaching the beginning of Nanbokucho, so that the old account that he died in Koei 2 (1343) cannot, the notes say, be dismissed out of hand.
He is Sai-jo saku in Fujishiro's grading, and the weight of designation behind his name is the heaviest in the field: seven of his blades are National Treasures, the most of any smith, with twelve Important Cultural Properties, and beneath them twenty-three Tokubetsu Juyo and thirty-four Juyo. Almost all that survives is osuriage-mumei attribution, accepted as the work of a high-rank Soshu master (Soshu joko); signed pieces are exceedingly rare, four blades in the official record against fifty-six unsigned: three tanto, and the Meibutsu Kinoshita Masamune, the tachi of which the published sources write that among Masamune's rare ubu tachi it is the only one whose signature cannot be denied. The Meibutsu Ashiya Masamune and the Meibutsu Ikeda Masamune carry shu-mei, red-lacquer attribution inscriptions added by later appraisers, not the smith's own signature.
The provenance recorded against his blades is exceptional, sixty-five works carrying a history through the men who held the country: Oda Nobunaga, Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Tokugawa Ieyasu, Ishida Mitsunari, Honda Heihachiro Tadakatsu, Kobayakawa Takakage, the Maeda Family, the Owari Tokugawa Family and the Imperial Family. Ten of his blades are locked forever in the National Treasure and Important Cultural Property tiers and can never trade; the rest are held largely by the Tokyo National Museum, the Kyoto National Museum, the Tokugawa Art Museum, the Maeda Foundation, Eisei Bunko and Atsuta Jingu. A Masamune coming into open hands is among the rarest events in the field.
Where Masamune stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Soshu-den · Sagami
Phase: Sōshū相州· 1288–1385
46 pieces on the market now
Steel "bright and clear," with thick ji-nie and chikei entering frequently, is the constant the NBTHK returns to in nearly every blade of this phase, and it marks the moment the Soshu tradition reached its summit in Sagami. " The sampled blades cluster around the masters who carried this manner forward: Go Yoshihiro of Matsukura-go in Etchu, counted among the Masamune Juttetsu and represented here by numerous ō-suriage katana, and the Sagami smiths Hiromitsu and Akihiro, who stand "next after Sadamune" and extend the phase with dated works running from Enbun 2 (1357) to Shitoku 4 (1387). The window spans late Kamakura proportions through the broad Enbun-Joji forms of the fourteenth century. The phase reads as itame-hada mixed with mokume, often tending toward standing or flowing grain, carrying very fine ji-nie laid thickly with chikei threaded densely throughout; over this the hamon is founded on notare mixed with gunome, ko-gunome, and a chōji flavor, with deep nioi, thick nie, and kinsuji and sunagashi running well, the nioiguchi bright and clear. This is precisely the distance the school traveled from its Awataguchi roots: where that foundation held a tight, restrained suguha, the Go katana break into wide yakihaba, nie-kuzure, and yubashiri (one setsumei records nie that "gathers, thickens, and congeals"), with a bōshi tempered so deeply it becomes ichimai and sweeps in hakikake. Go himself sits one step calmer than Masamune and Norishige, his chikei and kinsuji more reserved but his ji and ha a step brighter, the hada often masame-inclined; one wide-suguha example with ko-midare shows how close the quiet end of his range stays to the Kunimitsu manner.
" Here the classic phase divides from the later Sue-Soshu continuation, whose Muromachi smiths inherited the vocabulary without the depth of nie and clarity of steel recorded in these blades. A collector separates this phase because it holds the recognized masters at full strength. Go achieved the highest designation through the unmistakable brightness of his ji-ha alone, despite no surviving signed works, and the sample carries the weight of that reputation: the meibutsu Nakagawa-Go owned by a retainer of Oda Nobunaga and later the Tokugawa house, the "Kabuto-giri" Go inlaid by Hon'ami appraisal, the Okubo-Go transmitted in the Odawara Okubo family, and blades held by the Uwajima Date and Chikuzen Kuroda houses, with names recorded in the Kyoho Meibutsu-cho. The kantei points are concrete and repeated: Go's active nie-ashi, masame tendency, and ichimai bōshi; Akihiro's dated five-character "Soshu Akihiro" signatures, whose shift from full to abbreviated dating after Eiwa lets a viewer place a blade in time; and the near-indistinguishability of Hiromitsu and Akihiro, parsed only by scale and the prominence of dango-chōji. These are the works that define the Soshu apex, against which both the Awataguchi foundation and the Sue-Soshu aftermath are measured. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Masamune正宗 | 1288-1293 | 84 |
| Sadamune貞宗 | 1329-1331 | 86 |
| Go Yoshihiro義弘 | 1299-1302 | 54 |
| Akihiro秋廣 | 1346-1370 | 27 |
| Kunimitsu國光 | 1293-1322 | 69 |
Sōshū in the Muromachi period
In the Sengoku era the school served a second warrior court: the Later Hōjō at Odawara, whose patronage kept the Tsunahiro line forging hitatsura for the uchigatana age until the castle fell to Hideyoshi in 1590.
We could not find an authenticity certificate on the seller’s listing. Japanese swords and fittings are normally papered by the NBTHK (or the NTHK). Without one, the attribution is the seller’s own assessment and has not been independently verified — treat it with caution and ask the dealer about certification before buying.
Swords are non-returnable (blades cannot be re-imported to Japan). Insured shipping; damage/loss claims reported within 5 days of receipt. Cancellation fee 10% before shipment; not possible after shipment.
This is a signed Hirazukuri Wakizashi by Masamune from the Muromachi period. It features a wide blade with a nagasa of 39.1cm and a sori of 1.0cm. The blade weighs 291g and has a motohaba of 3.09cm and kasane of 0.55cm.
NihontoWatchmei · Muromachi · nagasa 39.1cm · sori 1cm
Soshu (Sagami) · Sagami · around 1288-1293
Fujishiro Sai-jo saku · Tōken Taikan top 1%
The published sources place Masamune of Sagami among the disciples of Shintogo Kunimitsu, the three smiths Yukimitsu, Norishige and Masamune who further emphasized chikei, kinsuji and nie within the Soshu tradition (Soshu-den) that Kunimitsu had founded, and led it toward completion. Masamune in particular, the NBTHK writes, handled several kinds of steel of differing carbon content with skill, and, by bringing the subtleties of nie to their highest refinement, did much to elevate the artistic quality of the Japanese sword. Among the three the same notes return again to a single judgment: that his ji and ha are "the most refined"[[c:1]], and that he stands at the very summit of the tradition.
The characteristic manner the published descriptions assign to him is a midareba whose main tone is notare, over which the temper rises intensely active: the nie becomes dense and breaks and clots, kinsuji leap and move, nie that spills into the ji forms yubashiri, and conspicuous chikei are woven throughout the jigane. This, the sources say, is a richly varied manner that may be called "Masamune's own invention"[[c:2]], and they return to one image for it: the impression of viewing haboku (破墨) splashed-ink landscape painting. The forging is itame mixed with mokume, with a standing tendency in places, ji-nie thick and chikei frequent; the boshi runs midare-komi, at times flame-like on one face. It is in this freedom that "the exquisiteness of nie"[[c:3]] reaches its limit.
The published record describes his work in two broad modes: one that, like Norishige, appears to take its models from old Ko-Hoki and Ko-Bizen pieces, and the notare-based nie mode above. Where his manner approaches Norishige the notes mark the kinship plainly, writing of one blade whose large chikei and thick yubashiri "recall the matsukawa-hada"[[c:4]] of Etchu Norishige; yet on close examination, the same source records, the jigane shows neither the blackish tone nor the clouded iron color of Norishige, the nie surpasses his in brilliance, and the nakago, tapering toward the tip rather than flared at the kurijiri, decides the appraisal for Masamune.
As to form, the published sources record that his katana run either to standard mihaba with chu-kissaki or to a broader width with a slightly extended chu-kissaki, while his tanto tend to the eight-sun range with shallow uchizori. From these points his principal period is reckoned the late Kamakura period, the lower limit reaching the beginning of Nanbokucho, so that the old account that he died in Koei 2 (1343) cannot, the notes say, be dismissed out of hand.
He is Sai-jo saku in Fujishiro's grading, and the weight of designation behind his name is the heaviest in the field: seven of his blades are National Treasures, the most of any smith, with twelve Important Cultural Properties, and beneath them twenty-three Tokubetsu Juyo and thirty-four Juyo. Almost all that survives is osuriage-mumei attribution, accepted as the work of a high-rank Soshu master (Soshu joko); signed pieces are exceedingly rare, four blades in the official record against fifty-six unsigned: three tanto, and the Meibutsu Kinoshita Masamune, the tachi of which the published sources write that among Masamune's rare ubu tachi it is the only one whose signature cannot be denied. The Meibutsu Ashiya Masamune and the Meibutsu Ikeda Masamune carry shu-mei, red-lacquer attribution inscriptions added by later appraisers, not the smith's own signature.
The provenance recorded against his blades is exceptional, sixty-five works carrying a history through the men who held the country: Oda Nobunaga, Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Tokugawa Ieyasu, Ishida Mitsunari, Honda Heihachiro Tadakatsu, Kobayakawa Takakage, the Maeda Family, the Owari Tokugawa Family and the Imperial Family. Ten of his blades are locked forever in the National Treasure and Important Cultural Property tiers and can never trade; the rest are held largely by the Tokyo National Museum, the Kyoto National Museum, the Tokugawa Art Museum, the Maeda Foundation, Eisei Bunko and Atsuta Jingu. A Masamune coming into open hands is among the rarest events in the field.
Where Masamune stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Soshu-den · Sagami
Phase: Sōshū相州· 1288–1385
46 pieces on the market now
Steel "bright and clear," with thick ji-nie and chikei entering frequently, is the constant the NBTHK returns to in nearly every blade of this phase, and it marks the moment the Soshu tradition reached its summit in Sagami. " The sampled blades cluster around the masters who carried this manner forward: Go Yoshihiro of Matsukura-go in Etchu, counted among the Masamune Juttetsu and represented here by numerous ō-suriage katana, and the Sagami smiths Hiromitsu and Akihiro, who stand "next after Sadamune" and extend the phase with dated works running from Enbun 2 (1357) to Shitoku 4 (1387). The window spans late Kamakura proportions through the broad Enbun-Joji forms of the fourteenth century. The phase reads as itame-hada mixed with mokume, often tending toward standing or flowing grain, carrying very fine ji-nie laid thickly with chikei threaded densely throughout; over this the hamon is founded on notare mixed with gunome, ko-gunome, and a chōji flavor, with deep nioi, thick nie, and kinsuji and sunagashi running well, the nioiguchi bright and clear. This is precisely the distance the school traveled from its Awataguchi roots: where that foundation held a tight, restrained suguha, the Go katana break into wide yakihaba, nie-kuzure, and yubashiri (one setsumei records nie that "gathers, thickens, and congeals"), with a bōshi tempered so deeply it becomes ichimai and sweeps in hakikake. Go himself sits one step calmer than Masamune and Norishige, his chikei and kinsuji more reserved but his ji and ha a step brighter, the hada often masame-inclined; one wide-suguha example with ko-midare shows how close the quiet end of his range stays to the Kunimitsu manner.
" Here the classic phase divides from the later Sue-Soshu continuation, whose Muromachi smiths inherited the vocabulary without the depth of nie and clarity of steel recorded in these blades. A collector separates this phase because it holds the recognized masters at full strength. Go achieved the highest designation through the unmistakable brightness of his ji-ha alone, despite no surviving signed works, and the sample carries the weight of that reputation: the meibutsu Nakagawa-Go owned by a retainer of Oda Nobunaga and later the Tokugawa house, the "Kabuto-giri" Go inlaid by Hon'ami appraisal, the Okubo-Go transmitted in the Odawara Okubo family, and blades held by the Uwajima Date and Chikuzen Kuroda houses, with names recorded in the Kyoho Meibutsu-cho. The kantei points are concrete and repeated: Go's active nie-ashi, masame tendency, and ichimai bōshi; Akihiro's dated five-character "Soshu Akihiro" signatures, whose shift from full to abbreviated dating after Eiwa lets a viewer place a blade in time; and the near-indistinguishability of Hiromitsu and Akihiro, parsed only by scale and the prominence of dango-chōji. These are the works that define the Soshu apex, against which both the Awataguchi foundation and the Sue-Soshu aftermath are measured. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Masamune正宗 | 1288-1293 | 84 |
| Sadamune貞宗 | 1329-1331 | 86 |
| Go Yoshihiro義弘 | 1299-1302 | 54 |
| Akihiro秋廣 | 1346-1370 | 27 |
| Kunimitsu國光 | 1293-1322 | 69 |
Sōshū in the Muromachi period
In the Sengoku era the school served a second warrior court: the Later Hōjō at Odawara, whose patronage kept the Tsunahiro line forging hitatsura for the uchigatana age until the castle fell to Hideyoshi in 1590.
We could not find an authenticity certificate on the seller’s listing. Japanese swords and fittings are normally papered by the NBTHK (or the NTHK). Without one, the attribution is the seller’s own assessment and has not been independently verified — treat it with caution and ask the dealer about certification before buying.
Swords are non-returnable (blades cannot be re-imported to Japan). Insured shipping; damage/loss claims reported within 5 days of receipt. Cancellation fee 10% before shipment; not possible after shipment.
