Yoshimochi worked in the Fukuoka school of about the middle of the period, and the reference works on signatures record him as the son of the Fukuoka smith Sukeyoshi, placing him around the Bun'ei era (1264-1275). The school Norimune founded was the flamboyant wing of , its name taken from the single character its smiths cut above the signature, and within it Yoshimochi is the quiet hand. The published sources return to one verdict across his blades: that many of his surviving works show a calmer manner in which the rise and fall of the choji is not conspicuous, and they name this restraint as the individuality of his workmanship (「丁子の出入りが比較的目立たぬ幾分穏やかな出来口を示すもので、個性的である」)1. He is graded Jo-jo saku by Fujishiro.
His characteristic temper is a small-patterned midareba worked low to the edge. The published descriptions build it from ko-choji mixed with ko-gunome and ko-midare, the yakiba showing little overall undulation so that the whole reads as a gentle, small-scale variation; ashi and yo enter freely, ko-nie adheres, and fine kinsuji and sunagashi run through. On a number of blades the base itself is suguha-toned, the small choji set into a straight ji rather than rising in the tall heads of mainstream Fukuoka, and on one Juyotachi the NBTHK records the temper as "suguha-based, mixed with ko-choji, ko-gunome and ko-midare"2 giving "overall a gentle and restrained manner."3 This is the trait the sources point to when they call his choji subdued (「丁子の出入りが目立たぬ比較的穏やかな手のもの」):4 the calm lies in the hamon, not in a bare or quiet jigane.
The forging is itame mixed with mokume, well refined, with fine ji-nie gathering and chikei entering delicately and often. Over that jigane the school's rich midare-utsuri stands clearly, the published sources calling it on the best pieces vivid and sharply defined; one Juyotachi shows a straight sugu-form utsuri in the lower half passing into midare-utsuri above. The nioiguchi runs tight and bright, nioi deep, and the boshi goes straight into a small round turnback, at times with a faint hakikake at the point. So the reflection that places him squarely in Bizen is kept at full strength while the temper above it is held back, and his individuality is read against that rich jigane rather than from any thinness of it.
The sources draw a clear exception to the calm hand. A minority of his works are flamboyant, the named example being the tachi preserved at Taiseki-ji, an Important Cultural Property, ubu and of commanding presence, with tightly packed ko-itame, prominent utsuri and a choji-midare temper. The same showy register governs the mumei Hatajima wakizashi, which Hon'ami Kochu appraised as Yoshimochi with an origami dated Hoei 7 (1710); set against his signed work, its hamon, the early designation records, "is conspicuously large in pattern and flamboyant"5 (「在銘に見る吉用の作刀に比して如何にも刃文が大模様であり、華やか」),6 though period and lineage are not in doubt. The Owari Tokugawa kodachi carries the showy mode furthest, its yakiba wide and mixing the tadpole-headed clove, "a flamboyant work with a wide yakiba and kaeruko mixed in" (「焼幅広く、蛙子の交じった華やかな作」).7 His signature is consistent and small. The published sources name a vertically elongated two-character mei, the character yo (用) running long (「「用」の字は縦長となる」), as typical, and add that the signature is always a small one (「銘は常に小銘である」).8
Within the school Yoshimochi works beside the brilliant Fukuoka choji of Yoshifusa and Norikane as its restrained voice; the published sources set his subdued small choji against the showier mainstream by naming Taiseki-ji as the flamboyant pole his ordinary blades fall short of. His own tachi keep deep koshi-zori and a slender build with marked funbari, the silhouette the records repeatedly call elegant. The dating is debated within the corpus. The Meikan line of descent from Sukeyoshi places him about Bun'ei, but one judge holds that too early, reasoning from the work itself that he is "probably to be regarded as active in the same period as Osafune Nagamitsu and related makers"9 (「恐らく長船長光などと同時代と思われる」). Either way the published sources accept the attribution where it is mumei, as on the Sekiguchi katana, whose nioi-dekichoji and well-defined midare-utsuri they find consistent with his hand.
In Fujishiro's grading he is Jo-jo saku. The designation record behind his name is small but high: one Important Cultural Property, two of his blades raised to Tokubetsu Juyo and five more to Juyo, ten works on official record in all, against which a private collector should weigh the published note that signed Yoshimochi are "probably fewer than ten"10 (「恐らく十指に満たない」) and that most of those are subdued small-choji pieces. The provenance recorded against his blades runs through the great houses: the Tokugawa Reimeikai Foundation, the Owari Tokugawa family, who received the kodachi as a betrothal gift for Princess Haru, daughter of Asano Yukinaga, the Mori family, and Mitsui Takayasu, who held the Juyo Bijutsuhin tachi at its 1939 designation. Of recorded whereabouts two are in institutional hands, the Sano Art Museum and the Tokugawa Art Museum, with one in a private collection. With no National Treasures and the Important Cultural Property held as patrimony, what may realistically be encountered is one of the Tokubetsu Juyo or Juyotachi, a signed example of the calm Fukuoka Ichimonji hand, and these come to market only rarely, a notable event when one does.
Historical importance
Where Yoshimochi stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.