Nobufusa is an early smith of the Fukuoka school in , working in the opening decades of the period. The published sources count him among the , the swordsmiths who served Retired Emperor Go-Toba in monthly rotation, and place his activity around the Kenpō era. They are candid about how little survives: reliably signed works are exceedingly few, and the published record names only the tachi at Hie Shrine, the tachi formerly in the Imperial collection now in the Tokyo National Museum, and the Hayashibara tachi beside a small number of others. The Meikan enters the name under both Ko-Bizen, around the Genryaku era, and Fukuoka Ichimonji, around the Kenpō era, and the published sources read the signed survivals as the Fukuoka Ichimonji hand, of the Ko-Ichimonji generation that followed Norimune. His is one of the first hands to carry the manner forward, and the survival of even a handful of signed blades makes him a document of how the Ichimonji school began.
His recognized work is a slender tachi of high koshizori, made and kept ubu, the width narrowing toward a ko-kissaki with the upper half inclining gently forward, an elegant shape the published sources read as the period's own. The hand itself is the tell. Over the jigane he sets a suguha-toned temper, calm rather than flamboyant, into which ko-midare, ko-chōji and small gunome are mixed, with ashi and yō entering well, the nioiguchinioi-dominant and carrying only a little ko-nie, at times subdued. This is the quiet, archaic register the published sources hold apart from the showy chōji-midare of the mid-Kamakura school, and on one Jūyōtachi they appraise the ji and ha together and conclude the blade is "to be judged the work of a smith of the Ko-Ichimonji lineage"1. The bōshi runs straight to a small round, on one omote finishing in a yakizume.
The jigane is the constant beneath that quiet temper. It is an itame, well forged and at times mixing mokume, packing into a dense tsumi-gokoro where the forging tightens, with ji-nie and chikei and an utsuri that stands clearly on every Bizen example. On the Tokubetsu Jūyōtachi the reflection comes as a jifu-utsuri, rising from dark patches in the steel, which the published sources say demonstrates the height of his forging technique; on the Kujō-family pair it stands as a midare-utsuri. This is the old-Bizenjigane he shares with the school, but the brightness of the reflection and the gathering of small chōji on his edge set him apart from the plainer Ko-Bizen smiths around him. The activity is carried in the ashi and yō rather than in towering clusters, the whole reading archaic and graceful rather than ornamental.
Within the signed work the published sources draw a careful internal distinction. The body of it is the suguha-toned tachi just described, but the pair of Important Art Objects long held in the Kujō family open into something fuller: there the temper begins from a koshiba at the base and proceeds as a chōji-midare, ashi and yō entering abundantly, one of the two worked in ko-nie-deki with ko-midare and chōji. The published sources hold the two by the same hand and call it one of their highlights that "the yakidashi rises at the machi boundary"2. The remaining face of his record is the ō-suriagekatana whose original signature was preserved as a gaku-mei; there the itame becomes a packed tsumi-gokoro with the utsuri standing, the suguha base mixing ko-chōji with abundant internal activity, and the published sources prize it as a scarce signed example, accompanied by a Hon'ami Kōchū origami of Kyōhō 1, in which "the archaic virtues of early Ichimonji are well displayed in the ji and ha"3.
What separates the early Ichimonji Nobufusa from his neighbours is exactly what the judges name. He stands at the threshold of the school, before its great flowering into the flamboyant chōji-midare of the mid-Kamakura Fukuoka, Yoshioka and Katayama hands; his temper is read instead in the older, calmer key, the jigane bright with utsuri and the edge gathering only small chōji. The published sources also record the old dispute over whether the smith writing 延房 is the same as the one signing 信房, and follow the view, dominant today, that they are separate individuals of the early Fukuoka Ichimonji group. On the Tokubetsu Jūyōtachi they note that the signature closely resembles that of the Kujō-family Important Art Object, a kinship of mei that makes the blade, in their words, "a sword of high documentary value"4.
For the collector he is a rare early name rather than a market presence. Fujishiro grades him Jō-jō saku, and the Tōkō Taikan places his work high among Bizen hands. He has no National Treasures and no Important Cultural Properties of his own on record; his surviving designated work runs instead through the Tokubetsu Jūyō and Jūyō tiers and the prewar Jūyō Bijutsuhin, only a few designated blades in all, and the Tokubetsu Jūyōtachi is one the published sources call "among the foremost works by the smith"5. His blades are preserved in institutions and long-held collections grounded in their own provenance: the Tokyo National Museum and the Hayashibara Museum of Art hold tachi by him, the Okayama Museum of Art Foundation another, and the recorded provenance runs through the Kujō family, the Kishū Tokugawa, the Ōmura house, and the Shōwa collector Kazama Yōkichi. With so few signed pieces in existence and most held rather than traded, a signed Nobufusa comes to light only rarely; a privately held example is among the more notable things an early-Ichimonji collector could hope to encounter.
Master smiths summoned by Retired Emperor Go-Toba (後鳥羽上皇) to serve monthly rotations forging swords at the imperial court, ca. Jōgen–Jōkyū (1208–1221). A cross-school honor: each smith retains his own school (Awataguchi, Fukuoka Ichimonji, Ko-Aoe, etc.). The linked school NS-Gobankaji holds only Go-Toba's own Kiku gyōsaku blades.
Where Nobufusa stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.