Muromachi turned sword making into an industry: the uchigatana rose with massed infantry warfare, Osafune and Seki produced bundle swords beside custom orders, and the Ming trade carried Japanese blades abroad by the tens of thousands.
This is a wakizashi by Tomoshige, certified as Tokubetsu Kicho and Hozon Token. It features a nagasa of 58.4cm and a sori of 1.6cm, housed in a shirasaya. The blade is from the early Muromachi period, attributed to the Fujishima school in Kaga province, known for its sharp cutting ability.
mei · Fujishima · Muromachi · nagasa 58.4cm · sori 1.6cm




Kaga (Kashu), the Fujishima school · Kaga · around 1394-1428
Fujishiro Chu-jo saku · Tōken Taikan top 26%
5 pieces on the market now
Tomoshige is the founder and representative smith of the Fujishima school of Fujishima village in Kaga province, the name carried by several generations from the end of Nanbokucho through Muromachi and on into the early-modern era. The earliest dated work found among them is a tanto of Oei 2 (1395), and the published sources treat that date as the chronological anchor for the whole name. The first generation comes down by tradition as a pupil of Rai Kunitoshi of Yamashiro, alternatively of Sanekage of his own province, but the NBTHK doubts both readings in nearly the same words across blade after blade, finding no stylistic tie to Rai Kunitoshi[[c:1]] and a chronological impossibility with Sanekage, and judging from the make and the nakago finish that the line descends rather from the Yamato tradition, close to the Yamato Shikkake hand. The oldest piece thought to be his, a tachi held at Atsuta Shrine, is read as confirming that distance from the Rai school. No surviving work predates Nanbokucho.
The recognition of Tomoshige lives in his jigane. He forges a board-grained itame that mixes in mokume and runs to nagare, standing somewhat open, the surface gathering ji-nie and chikei, and the steel carries a distinct blackish cast. The published record names exactly this as the school's chief point, that the jigane stands and tends dark[[c:2]], the mark of northern-country work. Over that jigane he tempers a gunome midare into which box-shaped, pointed and angular teeth enter together with notare and ko-notare, at times rising into a compound, multi-peaked midare. The NBTHK calls the feel of it a make in which Bizen temperament and Mino flavor are mixed[[c:3]], the ashi rather long, the whole nie-laden with patches of rough nie, sunagashi sweeping the ha and kinsuji entering, small tobiyaki scattered here and there. The boshi runs straight or midare-komi into a ko-maru and is often swept with hakikake. It is the conjunction that identifies him, a Yamato-rooted dark steel under an active temper that borrows from two other traditions.
The jigane repays a closer look, because it is where the school and the man are read. The board grain stands and flows rather than tightening into the fine ko-itame of a Yamashiro blade, and on the yari and naginata it sharpens further toward a masame-leaning hada, the most plainly Yamato of his ji. The dark color is not an accident of polish but a property of the steel itself, and the published sources tie it directly to the northern provinces, writing of one dated tanto that the blackish cast of the metal shows the kantei point of northern-country work[[c:4]]. Across several blades a faint whitish utsuri rises in the ji, the quiet shirake reflection of northern steel rather than a bright Bizen one. The hamon answers the ji with its own mix: angular and box-shaped teeth are singled out as a point worth naming on the typical work, the ashi enters long, the nioiguchi at times sits in nie and at times in a deeper nioi, and the activity is constant without ever becoming showy.
Within this single manner the published sources mark the short blades apart. On the tanto the school hand can quiet, the kitae tightening to a ko-itame, the temper dropping to a narrow suguha or a low ko-notare with ko-gunome and ko-nie, the nioiguchi sometimes misty with hotsure and yubashiri, the boshi a ko-maru that on one piece returns deep into a jizo-like shape. The longer blades carry the box-and-pointed midare; the tanto are where the Yamato base of the school shows most simply, even as the dark steel keeps its northern mark. A second, dated register leans further toward Yamato still: the Oei 16 (1409) wakizashi tempers a suguha base with small teeth and a yakizume boshi, and the NBTHK reads it as a make in which a Yamato temperament can be seen[[c:5]] while the dark color of the steel keeps the northern grain plainly shown[[c:6]]. As one of the very few early-dated Tomoshige it is valued as reference material for the school's range. The name is almost always signed, thirteen of fourteen designated blades on an ubu nakago, the four-character Fujishima Tomoshige most common, sometimes a two-character Tomoshige, the single long full signature surviving on one piece alone; the published sources lean on the signature and the date together to read a given blade as the Oei Tomoshige.
What sets Tomoshige apart from the schools his work otherwise recalls is held in his own grounded traits rather than borrowed from theirs. His midare resembles a Bizen make in its gunome and its long ashi, but the box-shaped and pointed teeth, the standing dark ji and the constant sunagashi pull it away from a clean Bizen choji; one wakizashi is read as showing an Aoe air, and one tanto is compared to Naoe Shizu and to Sekishu Naotsuna, the Mino and northern lines his own work sits between. The teacher question is settled by elimination toward Yamato, the line bound neither to Rai Kunitoshi in style nor to Sanekage in date. He stands at the head of the Hokurikudo Fujishima manner, kin in feel to the Etchu and Echizen smiths of the same region, and the name continues for generations on the same fixed character of dark standing ji and box-and-pointed midare, the Oei smiths the most highly regarded and the Muromachi work the most often surviving.
Fourteen of his blades stand in the Juyo tier, and Fujishiro rates the smith Chu-jo saku. His finest single work is a great spear, the o-mi-yari signed Fujishima Tomoshige and carved with a sanko-ken and the deity-name Myoken Daibosatsu, which the NBTHK judges not merely the best spear of the school and name but one of the representative famous spears of its age[[c:7]]. Surviving naginata by him are noted as rare. Provenance gathers around two houses recorded in his own blades: an Oei-period katana descended in the Inaba daimyo house, and a tanto held in the Imperial collection. These are heritage blades held in long-standing hands rather than goods of the market, and the man himself is not among the unattainable names; his designated swords come to auction and to dealers from time to time, a Juyo Tomoshige a realistic if uncommon encounter for a patient collector, valued less for rarity at the very top than for the way a single dark-steeled blade carries the whole northern school in its ji.
Where Tomoshige stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Years he was demonstrably active, proven by signed-and-dated blades
Yamashiro-den · Kaga
24 pieces on the market now
Among the provincial lineages of the Hokurikudo, the Fujishima school took its name and its base from the village of Fujishima in Kaga province, where Tomoshige stands as founder and the name he set down passed through several generations from the close of the Nanbokucho period across the Muromachi and on into the early-modern Shinto era. The members place the chronological anchor with care: the earliest firmly dated work is a tanto of Oei 2 (1395), and the NBTHK finds nothing among the surviving blades that goes back earlier than Nanbokucho. Old documentary tradition reads the first generation as a pupil of Rai Kunitoshi of Yamashiro, alternatively of Kashu Sanekage or Rai Toshimune, but the published sources doubt each reading in turn, finding no stylistic tie to Rai Kunitoshi and a chronological impossibility with Sanekage; judging from the make and the nakago finish, they settle by elimination toward the Yamato tradition, close to the Yamato Shikkake hand. A tachi held at Atsuta Shrine and a two-character ken read as the oldest surviving piece bracket the early end of the line. The recognition of the school lives in its jigane. The members agree on a board-grained itame that mixes in mokume and runs to nagare, standing somewhat open (hada-dachi), the surface gathering ji-nie and chikei, the steel carrying a distinct blackish cast named kan'a-iro and tied directly to the northern provinces as hokkoku-hada; a faint whitish shirake-utsuri rises quietly against this dark ground rather than a bright Bizen reflection. Over that ji the school tempers a gunome-midare into which box-shaped (hako-ba), pointed and angular (togariba) teeth enter together with notare and ko-notare, the ashi running rather long, the ha nie-laden with sunagashi sweeping it and kinsuji entering, small tobiyaki and muneyaki scattered here and there.
The NBTHK reads the feel of it as a make in which Bizen temperament and Mino flavor coexist, the boshi running straight or midare-komi into a ko-maru, often swept with hakikake or running to yakizume. The members also mark the short blades apart: on the tanto the hand can quiet to a ko-itame and a narrow hoso-suguha or low ko-gunome with ko-nie, the nioiguchi sometimes clouding to urumi, the boshi turning jizo-like or returning deep, this the simplest face of the Yamato base while the dark steel keeps its northern mark. To kantei a Fujishima blade the eye works the conjunction rather than any single trait: the standing dark ji read together with the box-and-pointed midare and the constant sunagashi names the school where a clean Bizen choji or a true Yamashiro ko-itame would not. The members note works read variously toward an Aoe air, toward Naoe Shizu and Sekishu Naotsuna, the Mino and northern lines the school sits between, kin in feel to the Etchu and Echizen smiths of the same region. Among the membership Tomoshige carries the name and the standing; Fujishiro rates the founder Chu-jo saku and places others among the middle ranks of the koto smiths, and the most highly regarded work falls in the Oei generation while the Muromachi work survives most often. The single finest piece is a great spear (o-mi-yari) signed Fujishima Tomoshige and carved with a sanko-ken and the deity-name Myoken Daibosatsu, which the published sources judge not merely the best spear of the school but one of the representative famous spears of its age; surviving naginata by the line are noted as rare, their ubu-nakago valued as dating evidence. Provenance gathers around named houses recorded in the blades themselves, an Oei katana descended in the Inaba daimyo house and a tanto held in the Imperial collection, heritage pieces in long-standing hands; yet the line is not among the unattainable names, and a Juyo Tomoshige remains a realistic if uncommon encounter for the patient collector, valued for the way a single dark-steeled blade carries the whole northern school in its ji. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Tomoshige友重 | 1394-1428 | 15 |
| Tomoshige友重 | 1346-1370 | 5 |
| Tomoshige友重 | 1324-1326 | 5 |
| Fujishima藤島 | 1394-1428 | 4 |
| Kiyomitsu清光 | 1573-1592 | 0 |
The Muromachi period (1392 to 1573)
Muromachi turned sword making into an industry: the uchigatana rose with massed infantry warfare, Osafune and Seki produced bundle swords beside custom orders, and the Ming trade carried Japanese blades abroad by the tens of thousands.
This work carries older NBTHK “Kichō”-era papers, which the NBTHK no longer issues and now regards as unreliable. To confirm the attribution, submission to an official Japanese examination body (such as the NBTHK or NTHK) for modern certification could be considered.
This is a wakizashi by Tomoshige, certified as Tokubetsu Kicho and Hozon Token. It features a nagasa of 58.4cm and a sori of 1.6cm, housed in a shirasaya. The blade is from the early Muromachi period, attributed to the Fujishima school in Kaga province, known for its sharp cutting ability.
mei · Fujishima · Muromachi · nagasa 58.4cm · sori 1.6cm




Kaga (Kashu), the Fujishima school · Kaga · around 1394-1428
Fujishiro Chu-jo saku · Tōken Taikan top 26%
5 pieces on the market now
Tomoshige is the founder and representative smith of the Fujishima school of Fujishima village in Kaga province, the name carried by several generations from the end of Nanbokucho through Muromachi and on into the early-modern era. The earliest dated work found among them is a tanto of Oei 2 (1395), and the published sources treat that date as the chronological anchor for the whole name. The first generation comes down by tradition as a pupil of Rai Kunitoshi of Yamashiro, alternatively of Sanekage of his own province, but the NBTHK doubts both readings in nearly the same words across blade after blade, finding no stylistic tie to Rai Kunitoshi[[c:1]] and a chronological impossibility with Sanekage, and judging from the make and the nakago finish that the line descends rather from the Yamato tradition, close to the Yamato Shikkake hand. The oldest piece thought to be his, a tachi held at Atsuta Shrine, is read as confirming that distance from the Rai school. No surviving work predates Nanbokucho.
The recognition of Tomoshige lives in his jigane. He forges a board-grained itame that mixes in mokume and runs to nagare, standing somewhat open, the surface gathering ji-nie and chikei, and the steel carries a distinct blackish cast. The published record names exactly this as the school's chief point, that the jigane stands and tends dark[[c:2]], the mark of northern-country work. Over that jigane he tempers a gunome midare into which box-shaped, pointed and angular teeth enter together with notare and ko-notare, at times rising into a compound, multi-peaked midare. The NBTHK calls the feel of it a make in which Bizen temperament and Mino flavor are mixed[[c:3]], the ashi rather long, the whole nie-laden with patches of rough nie, sunagashi sweeping the ha and kinsuji entering, small tobiyaki scattered here and there. The boshi runs straight or midare-komi into a ko-maru and is often swept with hakikake. It is the conjunction that identifies him, a Yamato-rooted dark steel under an active temper that borrows from two other traditions.
The jigane repays a closer look, because it is where the school and the man are read. The board grain stands and flows rather than tightening into the fine ko-itame of a Yamashiro blade, and on the yari and naginata it sharpens further toward a masame-leaning hada, the most plainly Yamato of his ji. The dark color is not an accident of polish but a property of the steel itself, and the published sources tie it directly to the northern provinces, writing of one dated tanto that the blackish cast of the metal shows the kantei point of northern-country work[[c:4]]. Across several blades a faint whitish utsuri rises in the ji, the quiet shirake reflection of northern steel rather than a bright Bizen one. The hamon answers the ji with its own mix: angular and box-shaped teeth are singled out as a point worth naming on the typical work, the ashi enters long, the nioiguchi at times sits in nie and at times in a deeper nioi, and the activity is constant without ever becoming showy.
Within this single manner the published sources mark the short blades apart. On the tanto the school hand can quiet, the kitae tightening to a ko-itame, the temper dropping to a narrow suguha or a low ko-notare with ko-gunome and ko-nie, the nioiguchi sometimes misty with hotsure and yubashiri, the boshi a ko-maru that on one piece returns deep into a jizo-like shape. The longer blades carry the box-and-pointed midare; the tanto are where the Yamato base of the school shows most simply, even as the dark steel keeps its northern mark. A second, dated register leans further toward Yamato still: the Oei 16 (1409) wakizashi tempers a suguha base with small teeth and a yakizume boshi, and the NBTHK reads it as a make in which a Yamato temperament can be seen[[c:5]] while the dark color of the steel keeps the northern grain plainly shown[[c:6]]. As one of the very few early-dated Tomoshige it is valued as reference material for the school's range. The name is almost always signed, thirteen of fourteen designated blades on an ubu nakago, the four-character Fujishima Tomoshige most common, sometimes a two-character Tomoshige, the single long full signature surviving on one piece alone; the published sources lean on the signature and the date together to read a given blade as the Oei Tomoshige.
What sets Tomoshige apart from the schools his work otherwise recalls is held in his own grounded traits rather than borrowed from theirs. His midare resembles a Bizen make in its gunome and its long ashi, but the box-shaped and pointed teeth, the standing dark ji and the constant sunagashi pull it away from a clean Bizen choji; one wakizashi is read as showing an Aoe air, and one tanto is compared to Naoe Shizu and to Sekishu Naotsuna, the Mino and northern lines his own work sits between. The teacher question is settled by elimination toward Yamato, the line bound neither to Rai Kunitoshi in style nor to Sanekage in date. He stands at the head of the Hokurikudo Fujishima manner, kin in feel to the Etchu and Echizen smiths of the same region, and the name continues for generations on the same fixed character of dark standing ji and box-and-pointed midare, the Oei smiths the most highly regarded and the Muromachi work the most often surviving.
Fourteen of his blades stand in the Juyo tier, and Fujishiro rates the smith Chu-jo saku. His finest single work is a great spear, the o-mi-yari signed Fujishima Tomoshige and carved with a sanko-ken and the deity-name Myoken Daibosatsu, which the NBTHK judges not merely the best spear of the school and name but one of the representative famous spears of its age[[c:7]]. Surviving naginata by him are noted as rare. Provenance gathers around two houses recorded in his own blades: an Oei-period katana descended in the Inaba daimyo house, and a tanto held in the Imperial collection. These are heritage blades held in long-standing hands rather than goods of the market, and the man himself is not among the unattainable names; his designated swords come to auction and to dealers from time to time, a Juyo Tomoshige a realistic if uncommon encounter for a patient collector, valued less for rarity at the very top than for the way a single dark-steeled blade carries the whole northern school in its ji.
Where Tomoshige stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Years he was demonstrably active, proven by signed-and-dated blades
Yamashiro-den · Kaga
24 pieces on the market now
Among the provincial lineages of the Hokurikudo, the Fujishima school took its name and its base from the village of Fujishima in Kaga province, where Tomoshige stands as founder and the name he set down passed through several generations from the close of the Nanbokucho period across the Muromachi and on into the early-modern Shinto era. The members place the chronological anchor with care: the earliest firmly dated work is a tanto of Oei 2 (1395), and the NBTHK finds nothing among the surviving blades that goes back earlier than Nanbokucho. Old documentary tradition reads the first generation as a pupil of Rai Kunitoshi of Yamashiro, alternatively of Kashu Sanekage or Rai Toshimune, but the published sources doubt each reading in turn, finding no stylistic tie to Rai Kunitoshi and a chronological impossibility with Sanekage; judging from the make and the nakago finish, they settle by elimination toward the Yamato tradition, close to the Yamato Shikkake hand. A tachi held at Atsuta Shrine and a two-character ken read as the oldest surviving piece bracket the early end of the line. The recognition of the school lives in its jigane. The members agree on a board-grained itame that mixes in mokume and runs to nagare, standing somewhat open (hada-dachi), the surface gathering ji-nie and chikei, the steel carrying a distinct blackish cast named kan'a-iro and tied directly to the northern provinces as hokkoku-hada; a faint whitish shirake-utsuri rises quietly against this dark ground rather than a bright Bizen reflection. Over that ji the school tempers a gunome-midare into which box-shaped (hako-ba), pointed and angular (togariba) teeth enter together with notare and ko-notare, the ashi running rather long, the ha nie-laden with sunagashi sweeping it and kinsuji entering, small tobiyaki and muneyaki scattered here and there.
The NBTHK reads the feel of it as a make in which Bizen temperament and Mino flavor coexist, the boshi running straight or midare-komi into a ko-maru, often swept with hakikake or running to yakizume. The members also mark the short blades apart: on the tanto the hand can quiet to a ko-itame and a narrow hoso-suguha or low ko-gunome with ko-nie, the nioiguchi sometimes clouding to urumi, the boshi turning jizo-like or returning deep, this the simplest face of the Yamato base while the dark steel keeps its northern mark. To kantei a Fujishima blade the eye works the conjunction rather than any single trait: the standing dark ji read together with the box-and-pointed midare and the constant sunagashi names the school where a clean Bizen choji or a true Yamashiro ko-itame would not. The members note works read variously toward an Aoe air, toward Naoe Shizu and Sekishu Naotsuna, the Mino and northern lines the school sits between, kin in feel to the Etchu and Echizen smiths of the same region. Among the membership Tomoshige carries the name and the standing; Fujishiro rates the founder Chu-jo saku and places others among the middle ranks of the koto smiths, and the most highly regarded work falls in the Oei generation while the Muromachi work survives most often. The single finest piece is a great spear (o-mi-yari) signed Fujishima Tomoshige and carved with a sanko-ken and the deity-name Myoken Daibosatsu, which the published sources judge not merely the best spear of the school but one of the representative famous spears of its age; surviving naginata by the line are noted as rare, their ubu-nakago valued as dating evidence. Provenance gathers around named houses recorded in the blades themselves, an Oei katana descended in the Inaba daimyo house and a tanto held in the Imperial collection, heritage pieces in long-standing hands; yet the line is not among the unattainable names, and a Juyo Tomoshige remains a realistic if uncommon encounter for the patient collector, valued for the way a single dark-steeled blade carries the whole northern school in its ji. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Tomoshige友重 | 1394-1428 | 15 |
| Tomoshige友重 | 1346-1370 | 5 |
| Tomoshige友重 | 1324-1326 | 5 |
| Fujishima藤島 | 1394-1428 | 4 |
| Kiyomitsu清光 | 1573-1592 | 0 |
The Muromachi period (1392 to 1573)
Muromachi turned sword making into an industry: the uchigatana rose with massed infantry warfare, Osafune and Seki produced bundle swords beside custom orders, and the Ming trade carried Japanese blades abroad by the tens of thousands.
This work carries older NBTHK “Kichō”-era papers, which the NBTHK no longer issues and now regards as unreliable. To confirm the attribution, submission to an official Japanese examination body (such as the NBTHK or NTHK) for modern certification could be considered.