Narimune is one of the Ko- smiths, the earliest generation of the Fukuoka school that arose in at the opening of the period. The published sources record him close to the founder, naming him a son, a second son, or a younger brother of Norimune; the commentary states plainly that he 'is handed down as the second son of Norimune'. With Sukemune, Naomune, Munetada and the other early hands he belongs to the group the swordbooks set apart as Ko-, whose work the published sources describe as retaining, in shape and in and ha alike, the flavour of the older Ko-Bizen.
That early character is the heart of his recognition. His tachi are slender, with a small kissaki, the koshizori running high and funbari at the base, and the published sources call this 'the slender tachi form with high waist-curve and funbari, the typical shape of the early Kamakura'2. Over them the temper is composed quietly: a ko-chōji mixed with ko-midare, the yakihaba narrow, worked in ko-nie over a suguha-leaning base, several blades reading as a ko-niesuguha into which ko-midare and ko-chōji are mixed. This is the calm idiom the published sources separate from the full-size flamboyant chōji of the school's mid-Kamakura prime, the manner of Sukezane and Yoshifusa that came a generation later.
The jigane is a ko-itame, well packed, on one blade a little zanguri, with fine ji-nie and a midare-utsuri standing faintly above it, on the finest piece deepening to a jifu-utsuri with fine chikei worked in. Across the ha run ashi and yō, with kinsuji and sunagashi in places and, on one tachi, tobiyaki; the bōshi goes straight to a ko-maru, or enters in a notare-komi to a small round. The whole is small in scale and subdued rather than brilliant, the antiquity of the period showing as much in the quiet of the temper as in the slender bearing of the shape.
His record divides into two faces. The signed tachi, surviving ubu or only slightly shortened, carry the two-character mei and are the basis of his recognition. Beside them stand ō-suriagemumeikatana attributed to him, which the published sources affirm without hesitation as early Fukuoka Ichimonji work, dignified in shape and sound in ji and ha, while cautioning that the personal attribution cannot be pressed: there are, they write, 'few decisive points by which it must positively be Narimune'3, so the reading rests on period and school. On the same blades they note that 'the shape and bearing, and the make of the ji and ha, strongly retain the flavour of Ko-Bizen'4, which is the very quality that places him in the school's first generation.
He stands, then, at the threshold of Fukuoka Ichimonji, before its mid-Kamakura brilliance and still half within the world of Ko-Bizen. The published sources read his late designated tachi as a work in which 'the connoisseurship proper to Ko-Ichimonji can be savoured to the full'5, its well-packed ko-itame, jifu-utsuri and quiet ko-chōji together giving the antique repose that is his signature. Where the school's prime is read by its flamboyance, Narimune is read by its restraint.
The Fujishiro appraisers rate him at the jō-jō saku level, and his survival is slight: the published sources observe that 'the extant tachi of this name number no more than a few'6, with several pieces designated JūyōTōken, among them a late example confirmed in the sixty-second session, and three signed tachi designated Juyo Bijutsuhin before the war. The provenance is unusually distinguished for so early a smith: one of the katana attributed to him 'descended originally from the Tokugawa shogunal house'7, other blades carry the names of the Date house and of the Imperial collection, and his recorded whereabouts include public holding. These are designated works and long-held heritage rather than blades that trade; a signed Narimune is uncommon and comes to light only from time to time, while an attributed katana of the school may be met a little more readily, though never as a matter of course.
Historical importance
Where Narimune stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.