Price on request

Tracked across 76 dealers worldwide · price history · sold archive

Specifications

About the maker

Seki Kinju金重

Kinju, whose name the published commentary reads as Kaneshige, is counted since antiquity among the Masamune Jittetsu, the ten great disciples of Sōshū Masamune, and stands with Kaneuji at the headwaters of the Mino tradition. The published sources, citing the *Kokon Meizukushi*, give his Buddhist name as Dōa and his origin as Tsuruga in Echizen Province, recording that 'his Buddhist name was Dōa; a resident of Tsuruga in Echizen, an excellent master craftsman; he crossed over to Seki and resided there' (法名、道阿。本国越前つるがの住人すぐれたる上手也。関に越て住). Together with Kaneuji he is named the source of the Mino smiths, 'a founder, alongside Kaneuji, of the wellspring of Mino swordsmithing' (兼氏と並んで美濃鍛冶の源流). The *Kōzan Oshigata* preserves two tantō dated to Jōji 2 (1363), which fix his Nanbokuchō activity, and his securely signed pieces do not go back before that period, so the published record treats his direct tie to Masamune as a matter of tradition rather than proof. His hand is read as Mino-den held apart from the Shizu group, and the distinction the judges draw is precise. Where the Shizu work runs to pointed *togari-gunome*, Kaneshige tempers a calm line of *gunome* whose heads are round, set in a linked series: the published sources describe it as a temper 'in which, rather than pointed gunome, rounded-headed gunome run in a linked sequence' (尖り互の目よりも頭の丸い), accompanied by *ko-nie*, the whole 'calmer in overall impression than the Shizu group' (志津一派よりも穏やかな感). Over that quieter *yakiba* he lays a shallow *notare* or a *suguha*-toned base mixed with small *togariba* and, on the mumei katana, *kataochi*-like *gunome*; *ashi* enter, the *nioiguchi* tends to brightness, and fine *kinsuji* and *sunagashi* run through the temper with *yubashiri* and *nie-hotsure* gathering along the *habuchi*. This activity in *nie* is the Sōshū inheritance carried into Mino steel, and the published commentary names it a key point of appreciation in his work. The *jigane* is the constant tell. He forges an *itame* mixed with *mokume* and *nagare* that stands somewhat more than the Shizu *jigane* and runs toward *masame* near the edge, the steel laid with thick *ji-nie* and worked with frequent *chikei*, and on the long blades a whitish *shirake* often rises into an *utsuri*-like aspect. Where the forging tightens it becomes a compact *ko-itame*, as on the one signed tachi, with fine *ji-nie* densely set; where it opens it stands a little, the grain showing on the surface. The *bōshi* answers the temper, running *midare-komi* to a small round or a *yakizume*-toned point and swept into *hakikake*, sometimes with *kinsuji* entering the turnback. Across both his registers the *jigane* and its standing grain, more than any single feature of the edge, is what the judges read first. Two faces divide his record. The first is the research base: a small number of ubu, two-character signed *hira-zukuri* tantō and wakizashi, wide in body with thin *kasane*, several elongated in the Enbun-Jōji *sun-nobi* proportion, and one rediscovered signed tachi, suriage but holding its *koshizori*, that runs a continuous *ko-gunome* from base to point. These signed pieces are not uniform in manner: some are a quiet *notare*, some a linked *ko-gunome*, and the published sources note that a few run to a *hitatsura*-like full temper, evidence that the manner of the name is varied. At the base of the tantō he carves a devotional program, *gomabashi* and a *koshi-hi*, a raised *suken*, paired *bonji*, and on one wakizashi a four-pillar *dai-dangu* motif read as a symbol of Fudō. The second face is the larger one, the *ō-suriage* mumei katana and *naginata-naoshi* judged *den* Kaneshige, wide and imposing in the Nanbokuchō form, whose attribution rests on era and school where no single decisive tell settles it. Of the rediscovered signed tachi the published sources stress the weight of the find, 'the significance of confirming this work as a signed tachi by Kaneshige is therefore considerable' (在銘の太刀である本作が確認された意), for until then his long blades were known only as mumei attributions. What sets Kaneshige apart within Mino is exactly what the judges name. He is held away from the Shizu group by the quieter, rounder *gunome* and the more standing grain, the published commentary repeatedly affirming that his work 'differs in character from that of the Shizu group' (志津一派の作とは趣を異にし) while remaining unmistakably Mino-den of the Nanbokuchō. He is the founder beside Kaneuji rather than a follower, the smith whose calmer, *nie*-laden manner gave the Seki tradition one of its two roots; the workshops of Seki carried that Mino-den hand forward into the Muromachi, when the province became one of the great centers of sword production. The published record also notes a second-generation Kaneshige to whom certain wakizashi are attributed, so the name continues past the founder. For the collector he is a rare and early Mino name. Fujishiro grades him Jō-jō saku. He has no National Treasures and no Important Cultural Properties; his record runs instead entirely through the Jūyō tier, forty-five blades on official record, the great majority *ō-suriage* mumei katana judged *den* Kaneshige and only a handful the precious signed tantō, wakizashi and the single signed tachi that anchor study of the name. His blades are preserved in long-held collections and institutions, the Kyoto National Museum among them, and his provenance reaches the Tokugawa shogunal house: one signed tantō was presented to the shogun's family in 1679 to mark the birth of the heir Tokumatsu, passing through the hatamoto Soga Nakasuke. Because almost nothing of his survives signed and the long blades trade only at the upper Jūyō level, a signed Kaneshige is among the rarer things a collector of Mino-den could hope to encounter, coming to light only seldom and, when it does, standing as a document of how the Mino tradition began.

Nipponto

nipponto.co.jp