Weight: 605g (toshin only) It has appeared! This is a celebrated sword traditionally handed down as a work by Bitchu Katayama Ichimonji from the late Kamakura period, around the Tokuji era (1306, 720 years ago). However, in the recent Hozon Token kantei (appraisal), it has been attributed as a mumei sword by Chiyozuru Morihiro of the Yamashiro Rai Kuniyuki lineage, dating to the Bunna era of the Nanbokucho period (1352, 674 years ago). This was the time following the Kanno Disturbance, a conflict between Ashikaga Takauji, who wished to favor the samurai for their military exploits against the Southern Court, and his younger brother Ashikaga Tadayoshi, who prioritized the court nobles. It is said that the origin of Chiyozuru Morihiro lies with Yamashiro Rai Kuniyasu, who migrated to Echizen. This sword was originally a tachi of 2 shaku 5 sun, which became mumei due to o-suriage. Its sugata exhibits an elegant form with a distinct difference between the moto-mihaba and saki-mihaba. Although not easily seen at first glance, the jigane is forged in itame-hada; when held up to the light, a magnificent midare-utsuri appears abundantly in the ji. The horimono consists of skillfully carved bo-hi. The hamon is in nioi-deki with ko-nie, featuring a suguha-style tempered line mixed with gunome, showing wonderful hataraki within the blade. It is so well-made that it could indeed pass as a Bitchu Katayama Ichimonji. We received this sword from an old family who, as written on the shirasaya, had preserved it as a masterpiece by Bitchu Katayama Ichimonji. However, as they have aged, they requested that we pass it on at a low price to someone who will cherish it. Because the sugata retains the shape of the Kamakura period, a high-quality polish might even lead to a re-attribution back to the traditional Katayama Ichimonji designation. We are offering it this time at a special, ultra-low price. Please enjoy this piece.
Certificate reading — 無銘(千代鶴守弘)
mumei · Bunna (1352-1356) ND · nagasa 66.3cm · sori 2cm
























Yamashiro-den · Echizen · around 1394-1428
Tōken Taikan top 21%
2 pieces on the market now
Where Morihiro stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Yamashiro-den · Echizen
10 pieces on the market now
The Chiyozuru lineage took root in Echizen Province during the Nanbokuchō period, and the setsumei consistently trace its origin to Rai Kuniyasu (来国安). He is said to have been born in Yamashiro Province, with one tradition holding him a grandson of Rai Kunisue; he later moved to Echizen, where the meikan place him around the Jōji and Sadaji eras (ca.
1362 to 1368). A parallel tradition, recorded on the signed tachi attributed to Morihiro, names Chiyozuru Kuniyasu[[c:1]] as a disciple of Rai Kuniyasu and the founder of the line. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Kuniyasu國安 | 1345-1350 | 4 |
| Ieyoshi家善 | 1487-1489 | 0 |
| Kagemori景守 | 1394-1428 | 0 |
| Munemitsu宗光 | 1441-1444 | 0 |
| Iemasa家正 | 1492-1501 | 0 |
Certifies a genuine blade worth preserving: a signature confirmed correct, or, if unsigned, an era, province, and school that the NBTHK can reliably identify.
The NBTHK (Nihon Bijutsu Tōken Hozon Kyōkai, the Society for the Preservation of Japanese Art Swords) is a public-interest incorporated foundation founded in 1948 and supervised by Japan’s Agency for Cultural Affairs (Bunkachō); it is based at the Japanese Sword Museum in Tokyo. Its expert panels physically examine each submitted work (shinsa) and issue a certificate (kanteishō) ranking it by artistic and historical merit. NBTHK papers are the most widely recognized standard of authentication for Japanese swords and fittings.
NBTHK official siteFor returns due to customer circumstances, the cost is the customer's responsibility. For returns due to our mis-shipment or a defective item, we bear the cost.
Weight: 605g (toshin only) It has appeared! This is a celebrated sword traditionally handed down as a work by Bitchu Katayama Ichimonji from the late Kamakura period, around the Tokuji era (1306, 720 years ago). However, in the recent Hozon Token kantei (appraisal), it has been attributed as a mumei sword by Chiyozuru Morihiro of the Yamashiro Rai Kuniyuki lineage, dating to the Bunna era of the Nanbokucho period (1352, 674 years ago). This was the time following the Kanno Disturbance, a conflict between Ashikaga Takauji, who wished to favor the samurai for their military exploits against the Southern Court, and his younger brother Ashikaga Tadayoshi, who prioritized the court nobles. It is said that the origin of Chiyozuru Morihiro lies with Yamashiro Rai Kuniyasu, who migrated to Echizen. This sword was originally a tachi of 2 shaku 5 sun, which became mumei due to o-suriage. Its sugata exhibits an elegant form with a distinct difference between the moto-mihaba and saki-mihaba. Although not easily seen at first glance, the jigane is forged in itame-hada; when held up to the light, a magnificent midare-utsuri appears abundantly in the ji. The horimono consists of skillfully carved bo-hi. The hamon is in nioi-deki with ko-nie, featuring a suguha-style tempered line mixed with gunome, showing wonderful hataraki within the blade. It is so well-made that it could indeed pass as a Bitchu Katayama Ichimonji. We received this sword from an old family who, as written on the shirasaya, had preserved it as a masterpiece by Bitchu Katayama Ichimonji. However, as they have aged, they requested that we pass it on at a low price to someone who will cherish it. Because the sugata retains the shape of the Kamakura period, a high-quality polish might even lead to a re-attribution back to the traditional Katayama Ichimonji designation. We are offering it this time at a special, ultra-low price. Please enjoy this piece.
Certificate reading — 無銘(千代鶴守弘)
mumei · Bunna (1352-1356) ND · nagasa 66.3cm · sori 2cm
























Yamashiro-den · Echizen · around 1394-1428
Tōken Taikan top 21%
2 pieces on the market now
Where Morihiro stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Yamashiro-den · Echizen
10 pieces on the market now
The Chiyozuru lineage took root in Echizen Province during the Nanbokuchō period, and the setsumei consistently trace its origin to Rai Kuniyasu (来国安). He is said to have been born in Yamashiro Province, with one tradition holding him a grandson of Rai Kunisue; he later moved to Echizen, where the meikan place him around the Jōji and Sadaji eras (ca.
1362 to 1368). A parallel tradition, recorded on the signed tachi attributed to Morihiro, names Chiyozuru Kuniyasu[[c:1]] as a disciple of Rai Kuniyasu and the founder of the line. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Kuniyasu國安 | 1345-1350 | 4 |
| Ieyoshi家善 | 1487-1489 | 0 |
| Kagemori景守 | 1394-1428 | 0 |
| Munemitsu宗光 | 1441-1444 | 0 |
| Iemasa家正 | 1492-1501 | 0 |
Certifies a genuine blade worth preserving: a signature confirmed correct, or, if unsigned, an era, province, and school that the NBTHK can reliably identify.
The NBTHK (Nihon Bijutsu Tōken Hozon Kyōkai, the Society for the Preservation of Japanese Art Swords) is a public-interest incorporated foundation founded in 1948 and supervised by Japan’s Agency for Cultural Affairs (Bunkachō); it is based at the Japanese Sword Museum in Tokyo. Its expert panels physically examine each submitted work (shinsa) and issue a certificate (kanteishō) ranking it by artistic and historical merit. NBTHK papers are the most widely recognized standard of authentication for Japanese swords and fittings.
NBTHK official siteFor returns due to customer circumstances, the cost is the customer's responsibility. For returns due to our mis-shipment or a defective item, we bear the cost.