War at home and trade abroad made Muromachi Bizen the busiest forge region in Japan: a century of Sengoku demand after the Ōnin War, and export missions to Ming China carrying blades by the tens of thousands.
NihontoWatchNihontoWatchThis wakizashi is signed by Yasumitsu of Bishu Osafune, dated to the 18th year of Oei (1411). It features a nagasa of 46.6cm and a sori of 0.8cm. The blade comes with a koshirae and has two mekugi-ana.
NihontoWatchOffered by Katana Ando
Senoo Yasumitsu is a name with Jūyō-designated work, and we couldn’t find current papers for this piece. Treat the name as unproven until papers say otherwise. It mentions papers that aren’t in our records yet; only current NBTHK or NTHK shinsa papers would settle the name. — Hoshi Ask me first
Bizen-den · Bizen · around 1319-1326
Tōken Taikan top 39%
Where Yasumitsu stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Years he was demonstrably active, proven by signed-and-dated blades
Bizen-den · Bitchu
1 piece on the market now
The setsumei of the Senoo group (妹尾) locate it in Bitchu, on land that the documents identify as developed by Senoo Taro Kaneyasu, a retainer of the Taira. The forging ground lay in the lower basin of the Takahashi River, east of Aoe and so positioned closer to neighboring Bizen. The Genki Mekikisho and the Kokon Meizukushi, repeatedly cited across these blades, divide the Bitchu smiths into the Aoe smiths (Aoe kaji) and the Senoo smiths (Senoo kaji); the chief recorded distinction is that Aoe names customarily carry the character tsugu (次), which the Senoo smiths rarely use. The blades span the late Heian period to the mid Kamakura period, and name Noritaka as the progenitor, with members appearing across the corpus as Masatsune, Tsuneto, Koreshige, Yasuie, Hirotsune, Tsunemasa, Moritsune, Tsunazane, Sukezane, Munesada, Tokimasa, Yukizane, Yukimasa, and a den Yukikuni. The setsumei consistently read the group against Ko-Bizen rather than Aoe, quoting the old phrase that Senoo work "resembles Bizen pieces" (Bizen-mono ni nitari), while for Masatsune they raise an unresolved question of connection with the contemporaneous Ko-Bizen Masatsune of the same name. A shared vocabulary recurs through the descriptions. The jigane is forged in itame or ko-itame mixed with mokume, the grain often standing slightly (hada-dachi), with adhering ji-nie, fine chikei, and mottling (ji-mura, jifu) that yields a chirimen-like crepe texture; the blades carry jifu-utsuri or a faint midare-utsuri. The hamon is a suguha-based line with shallow notare, mixed with ko-midare, ko-gunome, and ko-chōji, animated by ashi and yō, with sunagashi and kinsuji and a nioiguchi that frequently takes a subdued (shizumi) or moist (urumi) tendency.
The bōshi tends to sugu with a ko-maru turnback, sometimes with hakikake. The nakago shows ō-sujikai file marks and individual character signatures (jimei) cut in tachi-mei placement. Within this shared frame the setsumei mark distinct hands rather than one uniform output: Tsuneto's blade is brighter at the nioiguchi with conspicuous, florid ko-chōji; the Sukezane of Senoo runs a higher, more brilliant temper with reverse-slanting that the description reads as resembling Aoe work; Munesada and Yukizane present a more archaic, subdued bearing; and the several Masatsune blades sit so close to Ko-Bizen that one carried a Hon'ami Koyu origami attributing it to Bizen Masatsune. For kantei, the setsumei isolate the points that separate Senoo from the Ko-Bizen it imitates: a prominent mokume and standing hada in the jigane, the crepe-like ji-mura, and unambiguous ō-sujikai yasurime, together with the tachi-mei signing habit that sets the group apart from Aoe. Masatsune is named the representative smith, his works not particularly scarce while surviving pieces by the other hands are described as exceedingly rare; Noritaka is treated as founder, and reference works note two generations each for Tsuneto and the Senoo Sukezane, placed across the Hoji, Joei, and Bun'ei eras. Named provenance recorded in the corpus includes a tachi transmitted in the Great Tokugawa house, a Sukezane held in the Bizen Ikeda family with its ito-maki tachi koshirae, and a Masatsune orikaeshi-mei held in the Sendai Date family. The setsumei present the Senoo smiths as a Bitchu line standing beside Aoe and reaching toward Bizen, valued where signed examples survive as source material for study of the individual smiths and of the group as a whole. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Munesada宗貞 | 1240-1243 | 1 |
| Munetada宗忠 | 1306-1308 | 1 |
| Noritsune則恒 | 1260-1261 | 1 |
| Noritsune則常 | 1235-1238 | 1 |
| Kaneyasu包安 | 1261-1264 | 1 |
Bizen in the Muromachi period
War at home and trade abroad made Muromachi Bizen the busiest forge region in Japan: a century of Sengoku demand after the Ōnin War, and export missions to Ming China carrying blades by the tens of thousands.
We could not find an authenticity certificate on the seller’s listing. Japanese swords and fittings are normally papered by the NBTHK (or the NTHK). Without one, the attribution is the seller’s own assessment and has not been independently verified — treat it with caution and ask the dealer about certification before buying.
¥450,000