The school emerged as the dominant sword-making tradition of Province during the late period, establishing a production center that would endure through the and into the era. The school's foundations were laid by Nagamitsu and his students, including Sanetika, Shinchō (Sanenaga), and other craftsmen who worked as substitute smiths (daikusaku) within the master's workshop. By the period, the school had diversified into several distinct lineages: the line descending from Kanemitsu and his students (including Henkyō, traditionally regarded as Kanemitsu's younger brother or disciple); the Motoshige group (with associated smiths such as Shigema, Shigemane, and Shigesue, some of whom may represent first and second generations); and collateral branches including the lineage (traceable to Kunimori, with representatives such as Morikage) and the so-called —a collective term for late makers such as Hidemitsu, Tsunehiro, Nariye, and Jikō, whose technical accomplishments often fell short of the principal lines.
workmanship is characterized by a tightly forged , frequently mixed with and exhibiting a tendency toward (flowing grain), with fine densely applied and appearing throughout the . A hallmark feature is the presence of or -—bright reflection patterns that stand prominently in the forging structure. The exhibits considerable diversity depending on lineage and period: early works by Nagamitsu-school smiths favor narrow with shallow and admixtures, while -period production shows broader patterns—chōji-ashi running in fashion (as in Shigema), mixed with (characteristic of Henkyō and the Motoshige group), or small-patterned with angular elements. The frequently displays a tightened or slightly subdued ( or ) quality, with attaching well and activities such as , , and occasional adding visual interest. The typically enters in and turns back with a pointed tendency, though some examples show returns with vigorous .
The school's enduring influence lies in its combination of technical refinement and adaptable production models. From the aristocratic patronage evidenced by Imperial Collection () holdings—such as Shinchō's dated Kagen 3 (1305) blade—to the workshop systems that enabled substitute smiths to sustain output through periods of military upheaval, represented both the apex of craftsmanship and a pragmatic response to evolving demand. The school's late works, including those by title-bearing smiths such as Shūri-no- (Morimitsu/Moromasa) and the transitional group, document the gradual stylistic shifts from the robust forms of the fourteenth century toward the more slender proportions and quieter temperlines of the early period. Dated examples ranging from Einin (1293–1299) through Ōei (1394–1428) provide invaluable chronological anchors for the study of Japanese sword evolution, while the diversity of extant attributions—from confident signatures to works appraised through workmanship alone—attests to the breadth and complexity of production over nearly two centuries.