Ikkanshi Tadatsuna is the second-generation Ōmi no Kami Tadatsuna, son of the Ōmi no Kami Tadatsuna and one of the representative Osaka smiths of the Genroku years. The published sources record his common name as Mantayū, that he succeeded his father as the second to bear the title Ōmi no Kami, that he claimed descent from Kunitsuna and so prefixed to his signature, and that around Genroku 2 he began to style himself by the gō Ikkanshi. They place him among the leading Osaka makers of his day, one who is, in their words, "renowned for the brilliance of his and and the decorative beauty of his carving". His early manner follows his father closely, and the heart of his record is the broad, signed and dated that doubles as a field for the carving on which his fame chiefly rests.
His characteristic hand is read first in the temper. Over a tightly forged he opens a straight at the base and then runs two related manners. The earlier and more inherited of them is a chōji with well-aligned yakigashira and long ashi, the very style in which the shodai excelled, the long chōji-ashi entering and the sunagashi and kinsuji cutting across them. The published sources call him "a master who surpassed his father"2, and they locate the difference precisely: where the first generation's chōji is aligned and dignified, the nidai's is deeper in nioi, brighter in nioiguchi and firmer in ko-nie, talent they name shutsuran, the dye that outdoes the indigo.
His mature and most personal manner is the tōran-midare, the surging-wave temper collectors know as sudareba. The published sources tie it to the Tsuda Sukehiro circle and call it on one wakizashi his "favoured Tsuda-style tōran temper"3. Over the tight ko-itame, the ji-nie applied thickly in minute particles and fine chikei entering, he builds a shallow notare base mixed with gunome and chōji-like elements that swells into the wave, the long chōji-ashi still entering, the nioi deep, ko-nie thickly adhered, sunagashi and kinsuji running frequently, the nioiguchi bright and clear. The bōshi is a shallow notare-komi to ko-maru with hakikake. A quieter suguha survives on a small number of blades, the calmest and rarest of his three faces, set over the same bright ko-itame.
That jigane is the constant beneath all three manners. The forging is a ko-itame tightly and finely packed, the ji-nie gathering thickly and at its best falling in minute particles, with fine chikei threading the surface, the steel bright and clear. It is the well-made Osaka jigane rather than a rustic one, and it is the field his temper and his carving both sit upon. The reference texts list his oeuvre as the aligned chōji after the shodai, the tōran, and the occasional suguha, all opened from the long straight yakidashi that marks the Osaka start.
What sets him apart, more than any single feature of ji or ha, is the carving. The published sources treasure his tōshin horimono as Ikkanshi-bori, recording that he "earned a high reputation for surpassing his teacher, and his blade carvings in particular are admired and treasured as Ikkanshi carving"4; "his blade carving is skillful and is treasured by the world as Ikkanshi-bori"5. He cut a relief shin-no-kurikara within the groove, the ume-kurikara, jewel-chasing dragons, and the koi-no-takinobori, a carp ascending a waterfall that the sources believe he was the first to attempt and which they note has "not been encountered on any of his blades other than this one"6. He worked closely with the Osaka carving master Fujita Tsūi, and he cut the added inscription horimono dōsaku to mark the carving as his own hand, a feature, the sources observe, not seen on the shodai at all and one that established a model within Shintōhorimono.
For the collector Ikkanshi Tadatsuna is a leading Osaka Shintō name whose work can still be sought, though the very best is held rather than traded. Fujishiro grades him Jō-jō saku. He has no National Treasures; his record runs instead through the Jūyō rank in number, with several pieces reaching Tokubetsu Jūyō and a long signed ōdachi raised to Important Cultural Property. The published sources call one of his Tokubetsu Jūyōkatana a representative work from the period when he was at the height of his powers, excellent in both ji and ha, its Ikkanshi-bori exceptionally splendid. About fifty-two of his blades stand in the Tokubetsu Jūyō and Jūyō tiers, with a recorded example held by the Kyoto National Museum and a documented blade once in the keeping of the Asai house. Because his work is signed and dated and survives in fair number, a Tadatsuna comes to light more readily than most Osaka masters of his rank, yet a dated katana carrying his own Ikkanshi-bori is a landmark when it appears, and the finest, with the carp and the kurikara cut by the smith himself, are documents of the carving craft at its Osaka height.
Kantei
one Ikkanshi Tadatsuna hand read across three registers over a constant bright ko-itame ground: the aligned long-legged chōji after the shodai; his mature surging tōran-midare, the Tsuda-style sudareba; and a rare quiet suguha, all carried on a katana that doubles as a field for his Ikkanshi-bori carving
Tadatsuna of Settsu is read in our corpus as the second generation, Awataguchi Ōmi no Kami Tadatsuna, known to collectors by his gō Ikkanshi, the son of the shodai Ōmi no Kami Tadatsuna and one of the celebrated Osaka Shinto smiths of the Genroku years. The published sources record his common name as Mantayū, that he succeeded his father as the second to bear Ōmi no Kami, that he claimed descent from Awataguchi Kunitsuna and so prefixed Awataguchi to his signature, and that his skill was held to surpass his father, talent the swordbooks call shutsuran, the dye outdoing the indigo. His recognized prime is a broad, thick-kasanekatana with an extended chu-kissaki, forged in a tightly packed ko-itame with abundant ji-nie and fine chikei, over which he opens a straight suguhayakidashi and then runs two manners: an aligned, long-legged chōji inherited from the shodai, and the surging tōran-midare, the sudareba wave he took from the Tsuda Sukehiro circle, both deep in nioi with ko-nie well adhered, the nioiguchi bright and clear, sunagashi and kinsuji frequent, the boshisugu to ko-maru. A quiet suguha survives on a few blades. Above all he is the carver: the published sources treasure his tōshin horimono as Ikkanshi-bori, the relief shin-no-kurikara within the groove, the ume-kurikara, the jewel-chasing dragon and the koi-no-takinobori, often with bonji and goma-bashi, and he cut the added inscription horimono dōsaku to declare the carving his own hand.
Diagnostic discriminators
濤瀾刃toranba5
倶利迦羅kurikara4
unique vs his plain-carved blades (bo-hi only)
焼出しyakidashi4
Observation by phase
The aligned, long-legged chōji after the shodai (his early prime)
His earlier prime follows the shodai: a chōji with well-aligned yakigashira and long ashi, the manner in which the first generation excelled, opened from a straight suguhayakidashi. The ground is a tightly packed ko-itame with ji-nie, sometimes mixed with mokume, the nioi deep and the nioiguchi bright, ko-nie well adhered, sunagashi appearing and kinsuji running through, the boshisugu to ko-maru. What sets the nidai apart from the father, the published sources say, is precisely this brightness: the deeper nioi, the clearer nioiguchi and the firmer ko-nie, read as the talent that surpasses the teacher. The way the long chōji-ashi enter and the sunagashi and kinsuji cut across them is named as the highlight of his hand.
The surging tōran-midare (his mature sudareba prime)
His mature and most personal manner is the tōran-midare, the surging-wave temper the published sources also call his favored Tsuda-style wave, after Tsuda Echizen no Kami Sukehiro. Over the tight ko-itame, ji-nie thick and fine chikei entering, he opens a straight suguhayakidashi and then builds a notare base mixed with gunome and chōji-like elements that develops into the tōran, long chōji-ashi entering, the nioi deep, ko-nie thickly adhered, sunagashi and kinsuji running frequently, the nioiguchi bright and clear, the boshi a shallow notare-komi to ko-maru with hakikake and a somewhat long or deep return. The published sources read the finest of these as the typical and outstanding expression of Ikkanshi Tadatsuna's tōran-midare, the long-entering ashi cut across by sunagashi and kinsuji named as his conspicuous highlight.
Beside the two midare manners the published sources name a suguha register, less often seen on his signed work. Here the temper settles into a suguha or suguha-leaning line over the same tight ko-itame with ji-nie, the nioiguchi bright, the boshisugu to ko-maru. The swordbooks list suguha together with tōran and aligned chōji as the three faces of his oeuvre, the suguha the calmest and rarest of them.
Jigane 地鉄
小板目ko-itame2
Hamon 刃文
直刃suguha3中直刃調chu-suguha1
Bōshi 帽子
小丸ko-maru2
Scholarship
The published sources record that Awataguchi Ōmi no Kami Tadatsuna, common name Mantayū, was the son of the shodai Ōmi no Kami Tadatsuna, succeeded as the second generation, received the Ōmi no Kami title and took the gō Ikkanshi; that his early manner followed the first generation's aligned, long-legged chōji while his later work turned to gunome-midare, the tōran wave and even suguha; and that he was particularly accomplished at tōshin horimono, which harmonize without impairing the blade.3
On the carving the published sources record that he is thought to have been closely associated with the Osaka horimono specialist Fujita Tsūi, that the koi-no-takinobori (a carp ascending a waterfall) appears to have been first attempted by Ikkanshi Tadatsuna and is unseen on any blade of his other than one Tokubetsu Jūyō, and that he cut the added inscription horimono dōsaku to mark the carving as executed by his own hand.3
Dated Works
Years he was demonstrably active, proven by signed-and-dated blades
Active period
1685–1708Editorial estimate: 1673–1717
31 of 51 designated works carry a date
16801710
1685
貞享二年Juyo session 35, item 183
c. 1688
元禄十二二年Juyo session 31, item 191
元禄十二二年Juyo session 9, item 79
元禄二二年Juyo session 15, item 243
元禄十二二年Juyo session 10, item 140
1690
元禄三年Juyo session 22, item 293
元禄三年Juyo session 48, item 164
1692
元禄五年Juyo session 16, item 203
元禄五年Juyo session 15, item 244
1693
元禄六年Juyo session 31, item 190
1696
元禄九年Juyo session 17, item 258
1697
元禄十年Juyo session 26, item 317
元禄十年Juyo session 41, item 153
1698
元禄十一年Juyo session 34, item 107
1699
元禄十二年Juyo session 14, item 316
元禄十二年Tokubetsu Juyo session 9, item 29
元禄十二年Juyo session 19, item 330
1700
元禄十三年Juyo session 11, item 107
元禄十三年Juyo session 56, item 49
元禄十三年Juyo session 23, item 389
元禄十三年Juyo session 19, item 331
元禄十三年Juyo session 21, item 315
1702
元禄十五年Juyo session 32, item 81
1703
元禄十六年Juyo session 23, item 390
c. 1704
宝永二二年Juyo session 49, item 197
宝永元年Juyo session 44, item 128
宝永二二年Juyo session 49, item 198
1706
宝永三年Juyo session 15, item 245
1708
宝永五年Juyo session 22, item 294
宝永五年Juyo session 64, item 123
宝永五年Juyo session 63, item 124
Historical importance
Where Tadatsuna stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
随一
Foremost
屈指
Leading
有数
Major
All nihontōShintōGenroku & later
著名
Notable
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Designations
Kokuhō—
Jūyō Bunkazai1
Jūyō Bijutsuhin—
Gyobutsu—
Tokubetsu Jūyō3
Jūyō Tōken49
Elite Standing
0.22 across 53 designated works
Top 11% among smiths
Provenance
1 documented provenance across certified works by Tadatsuna
Imperial—
Shogunal—
Premier Daimyō—
Major Daimyō—
Other Daimyō—
Zaibatsu—
Institutions—
▸Named Collectors1
Provenance Standing
0 works held in elite collections across 1 documented provenances