NihontoWatch MonNihontoWatchBETA
MarketEncyclopedia
NihontoWatch Mon

NihontoWatchBETA

Market
Encyclopedia
Overview·Kantei·Designations·Provenance·Blade Forms·Signatures·Lineage·School
OverviewKanteiDesignationsProvenanceBlade FormsSignaturesLineageSchool
  1. Schools
  2. Ko-Bizen
  3. Sukekane

Ko-Bizen Sukekane

助包

Tokujū
Vol. 18, No. 32 · Tachi

Ko-Bizen Sukekane

助包

28 ranked works

ProvinceBizenEraGenryaku (1184–1185)PeriodKamakuraSchoolKo-BizenTraditionBizen-denFujishiroJo-jo sakuToko Taikan2,500(top 1%)TypeSwordsmithCodeSUK158
1Kokuhō
1Jūyō Bunkazai
2Jūyō Bijutsuhin
2Tokubetsu Jūyō22Jūyō Tōken

Overview

Sukekane is a swordsmith of the late to early period, his name one of the school's enduring puzzles. Two Jūyō-Bijutsuhin designated in 1935, one signed in six characters " no Sukekane " and held by the Matsudaira house, the other a small-signature blade from the Sakai house, fix him in the historical record; the published sources note that the name Sukekane is found among both the group and the Fukuoka line, and that there were likely three or four smiths who shared it. The man profiled here is the one, the archaic hand. The published commentary draws the distinction plainly: of the two Sukekane, "the former is an archaic, classical small- of -based workmanship, whereas the latter forges flamboyant chōji-based in which a sense of technical artifice is felt" (前者が沸出来の古雅な小乱の出来であるのに対して後者は丁子の華やかな乱刃を焼き技巧味が感ぜられる). His is the quiet side of the divide.

His characteristic temper is a -toned small . Over it run , and , with and entering well, the work -based, with and fine coursing through and, on a recurring group, and even sanjūba running intermittently along the upper edge. This is not the regular clove-flower of the smiths but the calm, antique line the published sources call the manner of old , where "flamboyant is uncommon" (総じて華やかに乱れるものは少なく) and "a -toned base with shallow predominates" (直刃調が浅いのたれを基調とする). The answers the edge below it, running straight to a or finishing in a -like sweep with , sometimes with drifting at the turn.

The is the constant. He forges a well-packed mixed with , the grain standing a little, with and entering frequently, and a clear rising in the . On the finest of them the reflection thickens into the patchy of old steel. Over that the is bright and clear, and the carries thick . The published sources prize exactly this antique flavor, calling one a work of "old-scented workmanship characteristic of " (古備前物としての古香な出来口), the and carrying a savory depth of taste.

Within his own record the work divides into two registers of one hand. The typical Sukekane is a slender , where it survives so or shortened yet keeping a high with , the point a compact , the temper a calm -toned . On his outstanding signed the line opens out: a broad into which , and angular elements are set, flowering into a brilliant that the judges single out, one such piece called "a particularly outstanding achievement" that strikingly manifests the features of . The signature is its own scholarly question. The published commentary records small, intermediate and large hands, and notes that while the convention treats small signatures as and large ones as , some works carry small signatures too, so that "a distinction based on the signature alone is not necessarily easy" (銘振りからは、必ずしもその区別は容易とはいえない).

What sets the Sukekane apart from his namesake is exactly this -based restraint. His bright , his -toned small with its and deep , and the archaic, slightly drooping shape with its are read as , while the flamboyant and the air of technical display belong to the other hand. On the and attributed to him, the published sources affirm the appraisal from the period and the workmanship rather than from any single personal tell, accepting the traditional attribution where the and are markedly archaic in tone. His blades stand at the root of the line, before the school's great flowering at Fukuoka.

For the collector he is a rare early name. Fujishiro grades him Jō-jō , and the Tōkō Taikan values his work near the top of its scale. He has no National Treasure of his own hand; his record runs instead through the Important Cultural Property rank and the prewar Jūyō-Bijutsuhin, with two blades in the and twenty-two in the . Because his extant works are so few, the published sources call his best signed documentary material of very high value for understanding him at all. His blades carry distinguished provenance, transmitted in the domain era through the Satake house of Akita, the Tokugawa and Matsudaira families, the Sakai house of Tadakatsu, the Ikeda of Inshū, and bearing in one case the gold-inlaid ownership name of Takeda Genshinren. Most are long held, not traded; only the and tier ever moves, and even then a signed Sukekane comes to light only seldom. A privately held example, of recorded whereabouts, is a notable thing for a collector to encounter, a document of how began.

Kantei

two registers of one Ko-Bizen Sukekane hand: the typical archaic, nie-based suguha-toned ko-midare over a well-packed itame and bright midare-utsuri, beside the broader suguha with choji and gunome of his finest signed tachi; the signature variation that divides Ko-Bizen from Ichimonji Sukekane is the school's central kantei problem

Sukekane is a smith of the late to early period whose name is one of the school's enduring problems: the records Sukekane under both and Fukuoka , the published sources hold that several smiths likely shared the name, and the conventional small- equals versus large- equals division does not hold without scrutiny, since even an Sukekane can carry a small signature. His hand is the archaic, classical one. Over a well-packed mixed with , with , frequent and a clear , he tempers a -toned into which he sets , and , and entering well, the work -based with and and a tendency to , the running straight to a or finishing in a -like sweep. The published sources call this the calm, -based small- of old , set against the flamboyant of the line. His finest signed widen into a broad with and that the judges single out as an outstanding achievement, while his blades are attributed to him from era and workmanship.

Diagnostic discriminators

unique vs Fukuoka Ichimonji line (flamboyant choji)

unique vs his plainer ko-midare blades (no nijuba)

Observation by phase

The archaic suguha-toned ko-midare (his typical Ko-Bizen hand)

His representative work is the slender , where it survives so or shortened yet keeping a high with , the point a compact . Over an mixed with , somewhat standing in the grain, with , entering and a clear , he tempers a -toned small . Into it run , and , and well in, the deep and thickly adhering, with and and, in the upper half, a tendency to and even sanjuba. The runs straight, turning back in a or finishing -like with . The published sources call the Sukekane a -based, archaic and classical small , set apart from the flamboyant of the line. On a few blades the work shows and an , moist tendency in the , the antique flavor the judges prize.

Sugata 姿
Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
Bōshi 帽子

The broad suguha with choji and gunome (his outstanding signed tachi)

On his finest signed the temper opens out: a wide -toned base into which , and angular elements are set, flowering into a flamboyant , and well in, thick adhering, fine and , the bright and clear. Over a well-packed the stands out distinctly and, on one of them, the patchy of old . The published sources call these works that strikingly manifest the characteristic features of and, beyond that, an especially distinguished achievement. This is the hand as his quiet small , widened and brought to the showier edge of the school, never the regular clove-flower of the line but a reading of it.

Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
Bōshi 帽子
Scholarship

The published sources record that the Sukekane name appears in the Meikan under both Ko-Bizen and Fukuoka Ichimonji, that several smiths, likely three or four, shared it, and that the signature comes in small, intermediate and large hands. The conventional division of small-mei as Ko-Bizen and large-mei as Ichimonji is not reliable, since some Ichimonji works carry small signatures, so distinguishing the two on signature alone is not easy.

On the broad signed tachi the published sources note that, although the archaic flavor predominates, conspicuous ko-choji midare appears in places, leading them to date such a piece to the early Kamakura; on the o-suriage mumei blades the attribution rests on Ko-Bizen workmanship and the period, not on a feature that must be Sukekane.

Designations

Kokuhō1
Jūyō Bunkazai1
Jūyō Bijutsuhin2
Gyobutsu—
Tokubetsu Jūyō2
Jūyō Tōken22

Elite Standing

0.32 across 28 designated works

Top 8% among smiths

Provenance

6 documented provenances across certified works by Sukekane

Provenance Standing

3 works held in elite collections across 6 documented provenances

Top 17% among smiths

Raw score: 2.18 / 10

Blade Forms

Distribution across 28 ranked works

Signatures

Signature types across 28 ranked works

Currently Available

Lineage

Sukekane
Students (4)
  1. 1.Kanenori包則2 for sale
  2. 2.Kanetoshi兼俊
  3. 3.Nagakane永包1designated
  4. 4.Sukenobu祐信

Ko-Bizen School

Other artisans of the Ko-Bizen school

  1. 1.Tomonari友成34designated
  2. 2.Masatsune正恒66designated
  3. 3.Kanehira包平32designated
  4. 4.Kageyasu景安1 for sale27designated
  5. 5.Yoshikane吉包46designated
  6. 6.Nobufusa信房13designated
  7. 7.Naritaka成高9designated
  8. 8.Yukihide行秀16designated
  9. 9.Motochika基近4designated
  10. 10.Junkei順慶7designated
  11. 11.Tsunemitsu恒光8designated
  12. 12.Toshitsune利恒21designated