Motochika is a swordsmith of the close of the and the opening of the period, recorded in the under both and Fukuoka , and the published sources call his surviving output scarce, judging him a maker of the early whose blades 'are considered to be by a smith of the early period, and surviving works are few'. His name sits at the threshold where the old tradition passes into the Fukuoka that would flower in the mid-, and it carries a connoisseurship problem with it. The published commentary describes two faces to the recorded work under his signature, one a splendid designated an Important Cultural Property, the other a ko-midare rich in nie certified an Important Art Object, and observes that 'the style of the signature is extremely similar in both'2, leaving open whether they are one hand or several.
His readable record is the quieter of those two faces, and its hand is the nie-rich ko-midare. Over the temper the published sources describe a ko-midare mixed with ko-chōji and ko-gunome, ashi entering, the nie gathering well and brightening into the interior of the ha, with kinsuji and sunagashi running frequently and intermittent yubashiri and tobiyaki along the yakigashira. This is not the full clove-flower of the later school but the calmer, nie-active manner of old Bizen, the activity carried in the ji and the ha rather than in towering clusters. On the signed Important Art Object tachi the same temper reads as a ko-midare in deep nioi with ko-nie, into which ashi and yō enter well.
The jigane is the constant beneath that temper. It is an itame mixed with mokume, tending to stand a little, over which lies a thick ji-nie and fine chikei, and from which a faint utsuri rises, the archaic Ko-Bizen steel the published sources read as the close of the Fujiwara age and the beginning of the Kamakura. The bōshi falls in a gentle notare-komi, turning back in ko-maru on the front and running pointed on the reverse, both sides swept at the tip with hakikake. The shape keeps the old bearing of its period, slender with a clear taper, a strong koshizori with funbari at the base on the signed tachi and a small kissaki, archaic and tasteful even where greatly shortened.
The central scholarly question around him is the relation of his two manners, and the published sources lay it out without closing it. One account holds the ko-midare blades to be Ko-Bizen and the flamboyant ō-chōji to be Fukuoka Ichimonji; another holds them the work of a single maker, the 'ko-midare an earlier phase and the ō-chōji-midare a later phase'3. Because the signatures are so alike across the two groups, whether the related blades are by one hand or by namesakes 'remains a question for further study'4. What can be said from the surviving signed work is that his hand is the calm, nie-laden ko-midare, and it is by exactly that manner that the school separates him within the old-Bizen field, his bright active nie and ko-midare set apart from both the plainer Ko-Bizen smiths and the showy chōji of the Ichimonji to come.
For the collector he is a rare early name with a slight designated record. The Fujishiro appraisers give no grade for him, and his survival runs through a single Important Cultural Property (the flamboyant chōji-midare), two signed pieces certified Important Art Objects, and the nie-rich ō-suriagemumeikatana raised to Tokubetsu Jūyō, of which the published sources say that, as a Ko-Bizen blade, one may 'fully savor the subtle fascination of its nie'5. He has no National Treasures. His blades are heritage held rather than traded: a signed tachi survives as an Imperial heirloom at Tanzan Shrine, and another, certified an Important Art Object, descended through Ikeda Kamesaburō. The Important Cultural Property is patrimony that does not come to market, and even the nie-rich katana stands at the top tier; a signed or Tokubetsu-Jūyō Motochika in private hands is among the rarer things a collector of early Bizen could encounter, and one appears, when it does, only with patience.
Historical importance
Where Motochika stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.