Originally from Yamato Province, Uda District (Nara), they migrated to Etchu (Toyama). This katana is appraised as a Ko-Uda work from the late Kamakura period. The jigane is a ko-mokume-hada mixed with masame-hada, exhibiting midare-utsuri throughout, which expresses the great age of the sword's era. The hamon is a nie-deki gunome-midare, with choji-no-ashi entering the temper line. The interior of the ha is extremely active, displaying numerous kinsuji; it is a magnificent example for those who wish to study kinsuji. Near the hamachi, it shows a superb spiral kinsuji-like activity, to the extent that it could be mistaken for a sword of the Soden Bizen Osafune Chogi school. The horimono reflects the Soshu-den style, with futasuji-hi carved down to the center due to suriage, allowing one to feel the breath of that era. Please enjoy this extremely old meito, designated as a Ko-Uda work of the Kamakura period.
NihontoWatchKamakura · nagasa 69.2cm · sori 1.8cm
Wakimono · Etchu
8 pieces on the market now
The Ko-Uda school (古宇多) carries its origin in its own steel, a Yamato craft transplanted into the northern provinces. Its story begins with the monk-smith remembered as Ko-Nyūdō Kunimitsu, held by tradition to have come from Uda District in Yamato and to have settled at Utsu in Etchū around the Bunpō era of the late Kamakura period. From that migration the school took its name and its grounding manner. Kunimitsu is the founder and the hinge of the whole attribution, for almost no securely signed first-generation work survives, and his earliest pieces are read instead by their strong Yamato-den character. Through the Nanbokuchō period the line sent out the smiths gathered under the Ko-Uda name, among them his sons Kunifusa and Kunimune, together with Kunitsugu and Tomonori, who reused the house names down the generations as the school flourished toward the Muromachi. Within that long descent the term Ko-Uda is reserved for work of the late Kamakura through the Nanbokuchō, the formative early phase before the later Uda manner settled. A shared vocabulary binds the early generations, set first by the Yamato root the school never lost. The kitae is an itame, frequently mixed with mokume and a flowing nagare grain that tends to stand rather than lie flat, often standing into masame toward the edge, the surface carrying ji-nie with dark chikei entering. The steel takes a blackish, kanairo cast and grows hazy and standing in places, and where the forging tightens a shirake-utsuri stands clearly in the ji; this northern color is the feature the appraisal turns on, the character distinctive to works of the north.
Over it the smiths temper a suguha or quiet ko-midare, mixing in ko-gunome and shallow notare, the hardening running in nie more than nioi, the nioiguchi tending to sink rather than to glow. Into the habuchi they work the Yamato activity the school keeps as its own: fine hotsure, crossing kuichigai-ba, crescent uchinoke, with sunagashi streaming and kinsuji entering, and a bōshi that runs straight into a ko-maru or sweeps off in hakikake. A second, Sōshū-leaning manner runs beside the first, traced to the Uda study under Etchū Norishige with the smith called Gō set beside him as a model; here the temper opens into notare and gunome dense with nie, calling the Sōshū tradition to mind, though none are of purely Sōshū construction. What separates Ko-Uda from the later Uda is this early concentration of Yamato hataraki and the darkened, dry-standing steel, with Kunifusa seen in a tightly forged jigane and Kunimune more often in a standing grain. To kantei Ko-Uda is to return a nie-laden blade to the northern provinces by its jigane and its sinking temper, since a piece dense with nie, kinsuji and sunagashi that reads at first as a high Sōshū hand is held to Uda by its blackish, standing steel and its rounded ha-nie, the resemblance stopping at construction. The published commentary divides the Sōshū debt itself, assigning the finely forged bright-steeled work to the current of Yoshihiro and the standing-grain blackish-steeled work to that of Norishige. Among the best members Kunifusa and Kunimune stand as representative hands, with the founder Kunimitsu read through both the archaic Yamato face and the bolder Nanbokuchō shapes, and Tomonori ranked among the more able of the line, his quiet whitish suguha and his nie-laden hitatsura work sorting by the presence or absence of streaming nie. The school's record is overwhelmingly mumei and ō-suriage, appraised to the group rather than to a single hand, so that a signed blade of any of these names is already a document and a signed early piece rarer still. Recorded provenance is thin, the work held rather than traded, descending through such hands as the Kurokawa Institute of Ancient Cultures and passing only seldom through the market; for the student of how the Yamato and Sōshū currents met in the north, the Ko-Uda blades are the place where that meeting can actually be seen. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Kunifusa國房 | 1368-1405 | 17 |
| Kunimitsu國光 | 1362-1368 | 9 |
| Tomonori友則 | 1390-1394 | 4 |
| Kunitsugu國次 | 1356-1361 | 1 |
| Kunimitsu國光 | 1317-1319 | 2 |
The Kamakura period (1185 to 1333)
Nearly every later authority calls Kamakura the golden age of the sword: the first warrior government as patron, the great traditions at full strength simultaneously, and, tradition holds, the finest smiths of the realm rotating through Go-Toba’s court.
The NTHK’s principal certificate, issued for a blade of considerable quality. It confirms a genuine signature, or, for an unsigned (mumei) work, records the judges’ attribution to a smith or school. The paper carries a detailed worksheet with a numerical point score.
The NTHK (Nihon Tōken Hozon Kai, the Society for the Preservation of the Japanese Sword) is the oldest of Japan’s sword-appraisal bodies, founded in 1910, decades before the NBTHK. After the death of its long-serving head it divided into two successor societies, the NTHK and the NTHK-NPO, both of which continue to hold shinsa. NTHK certificates are known for a detailed worksheet that records a numerical point score alongside the judges’ written opinion, and the society is especially respected for its attribution of unsigned (mumei) work.
For returns due to customer circumstances, the cost is the customer's responsibility. For returns due to our mis-shipment or a defective item, we bear the cost.
