This listing features a katana by Yamato no Kami Yoshimichi, a smith from the Mishina school who moved to Osaka. He was known for his distinctive hamon patterns, differing from his brother Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi. The Mishina school, originating from Mino province, was renowned for its sharp cutting ability and creative blade designs.
mei · Mishina · Edo
Mishina Yamato no Kami Yoshimichi
Edo
Settsu
Signed
Settsu (Osaka), the Mishina school, the Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi name-line · Settsu · around 1661-1673
Fujishiro Jo saku · Tōken Taikan top 31%
5 pieces on the market now
Yoshimichi is the most celebrated name of the Mishina school, the Kyoto-rooted shinto line founded by a son of Kanemichi of Seki. The first-generation Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi and his brothers Iga no Kami Kinmichi and Etchu no Kami Masatoshi are named together in the published sources as masters of the Sanpin lineage, the three smiths who carried Mishina work to the front rank of the early Edo period. This record gathers the Osaka branch of that name. At its center stands the shodai Osaka Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi, born in Keicho 3 and styled Sanpin Kin'emon, the second son of the Kyoto shodai who moved to Osaka and became the founder of the Osaka-Tanba line, around whom are set his son Yamato no Kami Yoshimichi, known as Mishina Uemon, and a blade the published record assigns to the second generation. Where the elder Kinmichi and the younger Masatoshi worked diversely, Yoshimichi held to one signature manner, and it is that manner the school is remembered by.
That manner is the sudare-ba, the bamboo-blind temper. Layered sunagashi and kinsuji are drawn through a notare and gunome midare until the temper stripes into parallel bands like the slats of a hanging reed blind, and the published sources call it the school's hallmark, the Osaka-Tanba line handling it more often and more skilfully than any other style. On a wide, slightly elongated, thick-kasane hira-zukuri wakizashi of Keicho-shinto shape, the shodai opens the temper with a long straight yakidashi at the koshimoto and then widens the yakihaba above it, building over a ko-notare base mixed with gunome into a flamboyant large midare. Long, vigorous yubashiri run through it, the sunagashi layers in double and triple bands until it stripes into the sudare-ba, ashi enter, strong nie gathers and clumps unevenly, long kinsuji appear in places, and muneyaki and tobiyaki are added. The boshi rises shallow and pointed in a tsukiage, swept with frequent hakikake into a flame shape and run down long. The published sources read the whole as bolder and more flamboyant than usual, of his hallmark style yet pressing on the work of the Kyoto shodai[[c:1]].
The jigane carries the temper. On the shodai's wakizashi the kitae is a compact ko-itame mixed with mokume, the ji-nie adhering thickly and exceedingly fine, fine chikei entering well, the hada flowing and standing a little in places. The yakidashi itself is a study of its own. The published sources distinguish the shodai's straight sudare-ba yakidashi from the broadening Osaka yakidashi, noting that here the yakihaba keeps an even width as it rises rather than spreading toward the upper blade, a point of recognition within the Osaka-Tanba hand. The slender katana assigned to the second generation shows the same vocabulary in lower key, an itame tending to nagare with ji-nie, a large midare with sunagashi and gunome and ashi resolving into sudare-ba, the boshi a shallow, moist o-maru swept at the tip. The temper is the constant, the build and the strength of the nie the variables across the hands gathered here.
The name is read by hand and by signature rather than by a single dated chronology. The shodai Osaka Tanba stands as the prime sudare-ba hand, his son Yamato no Kami Yoshimichi forms a parallel and contrasting one. On a wide shinogi-zukuri katana with a clear difference between base and point width, Yamato no Kami forges not the family blind-temper but a choji-midare in what the published sources call 「中河内風の丁子乱れ」[[c:2]], frequent ashi entering, ko-nie adhering, sunagashi scattered, the boshi a slight notare ending in ko-maru; at times a little of the family temper is mixed in, and rarely he works a rolling-wave manner within which choji are set, a range the sources liken to Ikkanshi. The published record judges this katana an outstanding example among his works, its nie somewhat stronger than on Nakagawachi pieces, and it notes his collaborative blades with the first and second Osaka Tanba Yoshimichi and with the second-generation Kawachi no Kami Kunisuke, by which the exchange among these Osaka smiths can be followed. The second-generation blade closes the descent: the published sources write that 「同工の特色ある簾刃を焼いて」[[c:3]] without vulgarity, sound in workmanship though slender in build.
Within the school the line is best placed by its own signature. The shodai's sudare-ba 「一派のお家芸である簾刃を最も得意としており」[[c:4]], and his straight, even yakidashi and pointed, flame-swept boshi distinguish his hand from the broadening Osaka yakidashi of his neighbours and from the choji his own son preferred. Against the Kyoto shodai he is most easily confused and most carefully separated: because the Osaka line cut no chrysanthemum crest while the Kyoto line did from the second generation on, the published sources give the character 守 of the signature as the decisive point, its 寸 element cut straight down on Osaka work and slanting on Kyoto work. The sources are honest about the line's later course, observing that 「代が下るに従って」[[c:5]] the manner grew more technical and more uniform, the temper settling toward a single pattern as the individuality of the founders thinned.
The Osaka shodai is rated Jo-saku by Fujishiro, and four of these blades are held in the Juyo tier, none higher on this record. Provenance is sparse but distinguished: one blade descends through the Imperial collection, the kind of patrimony that is preserved rather than traded, and a second carries recorded provenance as well. There are no National Treasures or Important Cultural Properties on this record to speak of, and the holdings are modest in number, so a designated Osaka-Tanba Yoshimichi is not a blade that appears often. When one does, it is most often a Juyo wakizashi or katana of the hira-zukuri Keicho-shinto build, and it comes to a private collection only from time to time and with patience. For a name carried by several generations to one signature, the surviving designated works are few enough that each is a documented point on the line rather than a routine example, and the sudare-ba on a sound blade remains the surest mark by which this Osaka branch of the Mishina school is known.
Where Yoshimichi stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Shinto · Yamashiro
71 pieces on the market now
The Mishina school (三品), one of the two dominant smithing groups of early Edo Kyoto beside the Horikawa, grew from the late-Mino workshop of Kanemichi of Seki, whose dated blades run through the Tenbun, Eiroku, and Tenshō eras. During the closing decades of the sixteenth century Kanemichi came up to the capital with his four sons and settled at Nishinotōin Ebisugawa, where the eldest, Iga no Kami Kinmichi, is recorded as having greatly raised the name of the line. The brothers, Kinmichi together with Izumi no Kami Rai Kinmichi, Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi, and Etchū no Kami Masatoshi, became known collectively as the Sanpin (三品) makers, and the published sources count Kinmichi head of the Kyō go-kaji, the five Kyoto smiths. From the second generation the house held a hereditary right to recommend smiths to the court for their titles and added that by-line to its signatures. The name continued under the same appellation to the end of the Tokugawa period, throwing off branches that included the Tango no Kami line working at Ōsaka into the Genroku years, though the published record consistently holds the founding generation the most outstanding of the line. Beneath every branch lies a shared vocabulary carried up from Mino-Seki. The jigane is the constant: an itame mixed with mokume that flows into nagare-hada and tends toward masame near the mune, the grain standing, with thick fine ji-nie and frequent chikei. Over it the Mino-derived gunome and togariba are refined toward a Kyoto manner, the nie strong and at times coarse, gathering unevenly, kinsuji and vigorous striped sunagashi running throughout. Two tells bind the house. The first is the Mishina bōshi, a notare or midare run-in pointed at the tip and swept with vigorous hakikake, the form Masatoshi shows at its clearest, described as if drawn from a picture. The second is sudareba, the bamboo-blind temper in which layered sunagashi and yubashiri stripe into parallel bands; Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi devised it, and the first-generation hand keeps it a free, semi-cursive disorder where his heirs would regularize it into a fixed lattice.
The lines diverge from that common ground. Kinmichi and his younger brother Masatoshi both excelled in a Shizu manner, the large midare of Mino grafted onto Sōshū nie, with Masatoshi the most versatile, ranging across Shizu, Mino sanbon-sugi, Yamato suguha, and Sōshū hitatsura. The later Ōsaka Tanba branch held to the sudareba alone, opening from a straight yakidashi, while the second Tango no Kami Kanemichi cast off the family chōji for a flamboyant tōran-style large gunome in alternating two-joined and three-joined groups, and a deep-nioi suguha read in the manner of Inoue Shinkai. To kantei Mishina is to read these two house marks first. The pointed, hakikake-swept bōshi and the striped sudareba, set over a standing itame that flows to masame, place a blade within the line before any signature is weighed; the sunagashi, far heavier than on a Bizen ji, is the very material from which the temper is built. Within the house the founding generation sets the standard. Fujishiro grades Kinmichi and Masatoshi Jō-jō saku, the Ōsaka Tanba shodai Jō-saku, and the second Tango no Kami Chū-jō saku, the sources judging the later Kyoto and Ōsaka generations markedly inferior to the founders as the manner thinned toward a single uniform pattern. Provenance on record runs through samurai and collector hands rather than great museums: a Kinmichi katana among the cherished swords of Tani Tateki, a Yoshimichi katana made for Naitō Kuroemon and another now in the Kyoto National Museum, Masatoshi blades passing through Oda Urakusai and the Imperial household, and a second Tango no Kami katana descending from the Aoyama wardens of Ōsaka castle. The brothers' blades are signed and knowable, dated examples rare, so the manner of the mei joins the workmanship in placing them; for the Ōsaka and Kyoto branches the cut of the character 守 separates one hand from the next. Most designated work is held rather than traded, so a signed founding-generation Mishina blade comes to light only from time to time, and with it the temper in which one of the most recognizable hamon of the Shintō era was first being worked out. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Kinmichi金道 | 1596-1615 | 23 |
| Yoshimichi吉道 | 1596-1615 | 36 |
| Masatoshi正俊 | 1596-1615 | 31 |
| Kanemichi兼道 | 1681-1704 | 5 |
| Yoshimichi吉道 | 1661-1673 | 6 |
We could not find an authenticity certificate on the seller’s listing. Japanese swords and fittings are normally papered by the NBTHK (or the NTHK). Without one, the attribution is the seller’s own assessment and has not been independently verified — treat it with caution and ask the dealer about certification before buying.
If, due to our fault, the item differs significantly from its proper condition, the item may be returned. Cooling-off is within one week of the item's arrival.

This listing features a katana by Yamato no Kami Yoshimichi, a smith from the Mishina school who moved to Osaka. He was known for his distinctive hamon patterns, differing from his brother Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi. The Mishina school, originating from Mino province, was renowned for its sharp cutting ability and creative blade designs.
mei · Mishina · Edo
Mishina Yamato no Kami Yoshimichi
Edo
Settsu
Signed
Settsu (Osaka), the Mishina school, the Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi name-line · Settsu · around 1661-1673
Fujishiro Jo saku · Tōken Taikan top 31%
5 pieces on the market now
Yoshimichi is the most celebrated name of the Mishina school, the Kyoto-rooted shinto line founded by a son of Kanemichi of Seki. The first-generation Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi and his brothers Iga no Kami Kinmichi and Etchu no Kami Masatoshi are named together in the published sources as masters of the Sanpin lineage, the three smiths who carried Mishina work to the front rank of the early Edo period. This record gathers the Osaka branch of that name. At its center stands the shodai Osaka Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi, born in Keicho 3 and styled Sanpin Kin'emon, the second son of the Kyoto shodai who moved to Osaka and became the founder of the Osaka-Tanba line, around whom are set his son Yamato no Kami Yoshimichi, known as Mishina Uemon, and a blade the published record assigns to the second generation. Where the elder Kinmichi and the younger Masatoshi worked diversely, Yoshimichi held to one signature manner, and it is that manner the school is remembered by.
That manner is the sudare-ba, the bamboo-blind temper. Layered sunagashi and kinsuji are drawn through a notare and gunome midare until the temper stripes into parallel bands like the slats of a hanging reed blind, and the published sources call it the school's hallmark, the Osaka-Tanba line handling it more often and more skilfully than any other style. On a wide, slightly elongated, thick-kasane hira-zukuri wakizashi of Keicho-shinto shape, the shodai opens the temper with a long straight yakidashi at the koshimoto and then widens the yakihaba above it, building over a ko-notare base mixed with gunome into a flamboyant large midare. Long, vigorous yubashiri run through it, the sunagashi layers in double and triple bands until it stripes into the sudare-ba, ashi enter, strong nie gathers and clumps unevenly, long kinsuji appear in places, and muneyaki and tobiyaki are added. The boshi rises shallow and pointed in a tsukiage, swept with frequent hakikake into a flame shape and run down long. The published sources read the whole as bolder and more flamboyant than usual, of his hallmark style yet pressing on the work of the Kyoto shodai[[c:1]].
The jigane carries the temper. On the shodai's wakizashi the kitae is a compact ko-itame mixed with mokume, the ji-nie adhering thickly and exceedingly fine, fine chikei entering well, the hada flowing and standing a little in places. The yakidashi itself is a study of its own. The published sources distinguish the shodai's straight sudare-ba yakidashi from the broadening Osaka yakidashi, noting that here the yakihaba keeps an even width as it rises rather than spreading toward the upper blade, a point of recognition within the Osaka-Tanba hand. The slender katana assigned to the second generation shows the same vocabulary in lower key, an itame tending to nagare with ji-nie, a large midare with sunagashi and gunome and ashi resolving into sudare-ba, the boshi a shallow, moist o-maru swept at the tip. The temper is the constant, the build and the strength of the nie the variables across the hands gathered here.
The name is read by hand and by signature rather than by a single dated chronology. The shodai Osaka Tanba stands as the prime sudare-ba hand, his son Yamato no Kami Yoshimichi forms a parallel and contrasting one. On a wide shinogi-zukuri katana with a clear difference between base and point width, Yamato no Kami forges not the family blind-temper but a choji-midare in what the published sources call 「中河内風の丁子乱れ」[[c:2]], frequent ashi entering, ko-nie adhering, sunagashi scattered, the boshi a slight notare ending in ko-maru; at times a little of the family temper is mixed in, and rarely he works a rolling-wave manner within which choji are set, a range the sources liken to Ikkanshi. The published record judges this katana an outstanding example among his works, its nie somewhat stronger than on Nakagawachi pieces, and it notes his collaborative blades with the first and second Osaka Tanba Yoshimichi and with the second-generation Kawachi no Kami Kunisuke, by which the exchange among these Osaka smiths can be followed. The second-generation blade closes the descent: the published sources write that 「同工の特色ある簾刃を焼いて」[[c:3]] without vulgarity, sound in workmanship though slender in build.
Within the school the line is best placed by its own signature. The shodai's sudare-ba 「一派のお家芸である簾刃を最も得意としており」[[c:4]], and his straight, even yakidashi and pointed, flame-swept boshi distinguish his hand from the broadening Osaka yakidashi of his neighbours and from the choji his own son preferred. Against the Kyoto shodai he is most easily confused and most carefully separated: because the Osaka line cut no chrysanthemum crest while the Kyoto line did from the second generation on, the published sources give the character 守 of the signature as the decisive point, its 寸 element cut straight down on Osaka work and slanting on Kyoto work. The sources are honest about the line's later course, observing that 「代が下るに従って」[[c:5]] the manner grew more technical and more uniform, the temper settling toward a single pattern as the individuality of the founders thinned.
The Osaka shodai is rated Jo-saku by Fujishiro, and four of these blades are held in the Juyo tier, none higher on this record. Provenance is sparse but distinguished: one blade descends through the Imperial collection, the kind of patrimony that is preserved rather than traded, and a second carries recorded provenance as well. There are no National Treasures or Important Cultural Properties on this record to speak of, and the holdings are modest in number, so a designated Osaka-Tanba Yoshimichi is not a blade that appears often. When one does, it is most often a Juyo wakizashi or katana of the hira-zukuri Keicho-shinto build, and it comes to a private collection only from time to time and with patience. For a name carried by several generations to one signature, the surviving designated works are few enough that each is a documented point on the line rather than a routine example, and the sudare-ba on a sound blade remains the surest mark by which this Osaka branch of the Mishina school is known.
Where Yoshimichi stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Shinto · Yamashiro
71 pieces on the market now
The Mishina school (三品), one of the two dominant smithing groups of early Edo Kyoto beside the Horikawa, grew from the late-Mino workshop of Kanemichi of Seki, whose dated blades run through the Tenbun, Eiroku, and Tenshō eras. During the closing decades of the sixteenth century Kanemichi came up to the capital with his four sons and settled at Nishinotōin Ebisugawa, where the eldest, Iga no Kami Kinmichi, is recorded as having greatly raised the name of the line. The brothers, Kinmichi together with Izumi no Kami Rai Kinmichi, Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi, and Etchū no Kami Masatoshi, became known collectively as the Sanpin (三品) makers, and the published sources count Kinmichi head of the Kyō go-kaji, the five Kyoto smiths. From the second generation the house held a hereditary right to recommend smiths to the court for their titles and added that by-line to its signatures. The name continued under the same appellation to the end of the Tokugawa period, throwing off branches that included the Tango no Kami line working at Ōsaka into the Genroku years, though the published record consistently holds the founding generation the most outstanding of the line. Beneath every branch lies a shared vocabulary carried up from Mino-Seki. The jigane is the constant: an itame mixed with mokume that flows into nagare-hada and tends toward masame near the mune, the grain standing, with thick fine ji-nie and frequent chikei. Over it the Mino-derived gunome and togariba are refined toward a Kyoto manner, the nie strong and at times coarse, gathering unevenly, kinsuji and vigorous striped sunagashi running throughout. Two tells bind the house. The first is the Mishina bōshi, a notare or midare run-in pointed at the tip and swept with vigorous hakikake, the form Masatoshi shows at its clearest, described as if drawn from a picture. The second is sudareba, the bamboo-blind temper in which layered sunagashi and yubashiri stripe into parallel bands; Tanba no Kami Yoshimichi devised it, and the first-generation hand keeps it a free, semi-cursive disorder where his heirs would regularize it into a fixed lattice.
The lines diverge from that common ground. Kinmichi and his younger brother Masatoshi both excelled in a Shizu manner, the large midare of Mino grafted onto Sōshū nie, with Masatoshi the most versatile, ranging across Shizu, Mino sanbon-sugi, Yamato suguha, and Sōshū hitatsura. The later Ōsaka Tanba branch held to the sudareba alone, opening from a straight yakidashi, while the second Tango no Kami Kanemichi cast off the family chōji for a flamboyant tōran-style large gunome in alternating two-joined and three-joined groups, and a deep-nioi suguha read in the manner of Inoue Shinkai. To kantei Mishina is to read these two house marks first. The pointed, hakikake-swept bōshi and the striped sudareba, set over a standing itame that flows to masame, place a blade within the line before any signature is weighed; the sunagashi, far heavier than on a Bizen ji, is the very material from which the temper is built. Within the house the founding generation sets the standard. Fujishiro grades Kinmichi and Masatoshi Jō-jō saku, the Ōsaka Tanba shodai Jō-saku, and the second Tango no Kami Chū-jō saku, the sources judging the later Kyoto and Ōsaka generations markedly inferior to the founders as the manner thinned toward a single uniform pattern. Provenance on record runs through samurai and collector hands rather than great museums: a Kinmichi katana among the cherished swords of Tani Tateki, a Yoshimichi katana made for Naitō Kuroemon and another now in the Kyoto National Museum, Masatoshi blades passing through Oda Urakusai and the Imperial household, and a second Tango no Kami katana descending from the Aoyama wardens of Ōsaka castle. The brothers' blades are signed and knowable, dated examples rare, so the manner of the mei joins the workmanship in placing them; for the Ōsaka and Kyoto branches the cut of the character 守 separates one hand from the next. Most designated work is held rather than traded, so a signed founding-generation Mishina blade comes to light only from time to time, and with it the temper in which one of the most recognizable hamon of the Shintō era was first being worked out. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Kinmichi金道 | 1596-1615 | 23 |
| Yoshimichi吉道 | 1596-1615 | 36 |
| Masatoshi正俊 | 1596-1615 | 31 |
| Kanemichi兼道 | 1681-1704 | 5 |
| Yoshimichi吉道 | 1661-1673 | 6 |
We could not find an authenticity certificate on the seller’s listing. Japanese swords and fittings are normally papered by the NBTHK (or the NTHK). Without one, the attribution is the seller’s own assessment and has not been independently verified — treat it with caution and ask the dealer about certification before buying.
If, due to our fault, the item differs significantly from its proper condition, the item may be returned. Cooling-off is within one week of the item's arrival.
