Among the works of Nagasone Okimasa that Honma examined, one Genroku katana is judged to be the foremost, and the published commentary holds that it approaches the fine work of Kotetsu himself1. Okimasa is the heir of the Kotetsu school. The published sources record that he studied under Nagasone Kotetsu Okisato, was later adopted, and succeeded as the second-generation Kotetsu, his technical ability standing second only to his master2. They go further: among blades signed Kotetsu there are probably pieces made as Okimasa's daisaku, substitute workmanship for the master, so that the two hands are not always separable. The dated work that can be verified runs from Kanbun 13 (1673) to Genroku 3 (1690), the silhouette throughout the wide-bodied, shallow-curved, chu-kissaki shape of the Kanbun-Shinto era. He worked in Edo, in the years when the late master's name had become the most sought in the city.

His representative hand is the juzu-ba inherited from Kotetsu, a chain of round-headed gunome linked along the edge like a string of prayer beads. The published sources call this manner his forte and read it as the hand received from his master. Two things make it his own rather than a copy, and the commentary names both. The first is a habatori in which the gunome run together in paired units, futatsu-zure, surfacing repeatedly through the temper. The second is the quality of the nie: it runs somewhat coarser than Kotetsu's and breaks into basake, a patchy unevenness in the hardened edge. The judges treat this not as a defect but as a point of interest, the very feature by which Okimasa is recognized. On one wakizashi the published record reads, "in points such as the nie set somewhat coarse and the sunagashi applied vigorously, Okimasa's characteristics are well displayed3."

The jigane over which this temper sits is a well-packed ko-itame, often mixed with mokume and at times standing into open itame, with fine ji-nie laid thickly in a dust-like mijin and chikei entering throughout, so that the steel reads bright and clear. Over it the hamon opens with a suguha-toned yakidashi at the base, the Edo convention, then rises into the juzu-ba on a notare foundation. Thick ashi and yo enter, the nioi is deep, ko-nie adheres, kinsuji and long sunagashi run through, and the nioiguchi stays bright. The boshi runs straight into a ko-maru with hakikake toward the point. Several blades bear bo-hi carved through the body, and a number carry gold-inlaid cutting-test inscriptions on the reverse, recording the blade's proven cutting power.

The published sources are candid that Okimasa is hard to date. His signatures take many forms, dated examples are few, and the kaisho form of the character masa is noted to appear only on Enpo 4 pieces. Within his oeuvre the commentary draws two manners. One is the juzu-ba prime described above, brought on his best blades to what the judges call a fully satisfying result, spirited and forceful. The other stands a little apart: the yakihaba widens into a shallow large notare, the nie running strong and uneven with yubashiri-like patches and tobiyaki mixed in, on a robust wide body with thick kasane and deep curvature. Of one such katana the sources speak of a manner overflowing with rustic vigor4, heroic in its grandeur, while noting that the bright nioiguchi and the paired gunome that still surface betray the same hand. One vein of this bolder work the commentary reads as touching the style of Izumi-no-kami Kaneshige, a connection between Kaneshige and the Nagasone group.

What sets Okimasa apart is measured against his master and within his own house. The judges read his blades as truly in the Kotetsu manner, yet repeatedly point to the wider yakihaba, the paired gunome, and the coarser, basake-prone nie as the places where he diverges from Kotetsu's calmer, cleaner edge. He is the open, public face of the line: as second-generation Kotetsu he signed and stood at the front, while one gassaku katana, returned from the United States, preserves an inscription showing the smiths Okihisa and Okinao supporting him behind the scenes. Signatures reading Kotetsu Okimasa make the succession explicit on the tang itself, and one such long-signed katana the commentary singles out as a work in which he pursued his own individuality while inheriting the master's style.

For the collector he is a leading Shinto name whose best signed katana, the sources say, approach Kotetsu's own. Fujishiro grades him Jo-jo saku. He has no National Treasures and no Important Cultural Properties; his record runs instead through the Juyo rank, twenty-five blades in that tier, together with one katana certified Juyo Bijutsuhin in 1942, the piece Honma called the foremost of the maker's works he had seen5. Provenance is recorded only thinly: an Ito family katana and a blade once held by Wada Torao, with no museum holder on record. A signed Okimasa, then, is held more often than it is traded, and a katana in his juzu-ba manner, sound in body and bright in the edge, comes to a private collector only from time to time, a document of the Kotetsu line at the moment its second generation took it up.