
藤原貞行 -Fujiwara Sadayuki- 6-095
¥495,000
Tracked across 76 dealers worldwide · price history · sold archive
Specifications
40.85 cm
3.2 cm
3.06 cm
3.45 cm
About the school
Takada School高田派
In Bungo Province on Kyushu, the early Kamakura masters Sadahide and Yukihira appeared and then, for a span, distinguished makers ceased; the *setsumei* repeatedly mark this gap before the line that became the Takada school took hold. The school was founded in the Nanbokuchō period by **Tomoyuki**, who arose at Takada Manor (*Takada-shō*) and signed in the long form "Hōshū Takada-shō Fujiwara Tomoyuki," with dated work surviving from the Shōhei (1349) and Jōji eras into the 1360s. Beside him the registers place **Tokiyuki**, said to be his son or disciple, and **Masayuki**, thought to belong to a separate line, whose Kentoku 2 (1371) *tantō* carries Southern Court dating and a *Kurikara* relief following the example of Yukihira. From these Nanbokuchō roots the lineage ran continuously through Muromachi and on into the *shintō* era. The naming itself tracks the periods: Nanbokuchō smiths prefixed *Fujiwara*; from Muromachi they signed *Taira* and shared the characters 盛・守・鎮・統, so the group is broadly called Taira-Takada (Heike or Hira-Takada); late in the line they returned to *Fujiwara*, and that stream, carried into the Edo period, is distinguished as Fujiwara-Takada. Named Muromachi hands in the *setsumei* include **Taira Naomori** (a ken dated Ōnin 3, 1469), **Taira Nagamori**, **Takada Tatemori** (Meiō 10, 1501), **Taira Shizunori**, and **Fujiwara Shinkiyo**. Across the blades a consistent vocabulary recurs. The *jihada* is *itame* mixed with *mokume*, frequently tending toward standing grain (*hada-dachi*) and, in the early work, drifting toward *masame* or *nagare*; *ji-nie* and *chikei* appear, the steel often carries a darkish *kanagu* tone with patches of *jifu*, and a whitish *shirake-utsuri* (sometimes a faint *midare-utsuri*) stands out conspicuously. The temper runs from *suguha* and *chū-suguha* mixed with *ko-gunome* up to *gunome-midare*, with *nie* adhering and *ashi* and *yō* entering; *kinsuji* and *sunagashi* run through, and in fuller-tempered work *tobiyaki*, *muneyaki* and *hitatsura* develop (as in Nagamori's Eishō *wakizashi*). Founder-period Tomoyuki work is recognized by angular *gunome* spaced at wide intervals, an overall subdued (*shizumi*) impression, strong *shirake* with *jifu*, and a manner the *setsumei* liken to Sue-Sa and the Samonji group; the school as a whole shows Bizen-leaning *utsuri*, Yamato-tinged *masame* and *nagare*, and at its summit, in Shizunori, work judged to take Rai Kuniyuki as its model. Branch and period read off the signature prefix and the shape: deep curvature with an arched, upturned profile through mid-Muromachi, then broader blades with shallower *sori* and an extended *chū-kissaki* in the later phase. A recurrent kantei point is the hard "leaf-like" *yō* within the *ha*, often described as "as if pricked by the tip of a needle." Among the smiths the *setsumei* single out **Nagamori** as the most accomplished of the Heike-Takada, a *suguha* specialist with notably good *jigane* and skilled *horimono*, his name carried across several generations and dated freely in the Eishō and Daiei eras; one of his blades was bestowed by Shimazu Tsugutoyo of Kagoshima on the retainer Honda Chikaaki, and **Tatemori** is rated near him. The line reached into early *shintō* through **Kunifusa**, a disciple of Shizumasa of Takada who moved to Uwajima in Iyo, served Date Hidemune, and worked in a Horikawa manner. Provenance runs through the descriptions: Masayuki's *tantō* was transmitted in the Shōnai Sakai family with a Hon'ami Kōchū *origami* of Kyōhō 6 and recorded in the *Kōzan oshigata* and *Umetada Meikan*, and Nagamori's *tachi* survives with a *maki-e* and *raden* scabbard. The cutting-oriented robustness of the work, weighty in hand with thick *kasane* and a sturdy build, reflects the taste of an age of warfare, and these blades served as practical arms across Kyushu. The *setsumei* are candid that Takada has drawn a generally low evaluation in the field, and several of the registered pieces are framed expressly as answering that judgment, restoring the standing of a long lineage on the strength of its best surviving work.







