NihontoWatch MonNihontoWatchBETA
MarketEncyclopedia
NihontoWatch Mon

NihontoWatchBETA

Market
Encyclopedia
Overview·Kantei·Designations·Provenance·Blade Forms·Signatures·Lineage·School
OverviewKanteiDesignationsProvenanceBlade FormsSignaturesLineageSchool
  1. Schools
  2. Mihara
  3. Ko-Mihara
  4. Sukekuni

Ko-Mihara Sukekuni

助國

Jūyō
Vol. 25, No. 218 · Tachi

Ko-Mihara Sukekuni

助國

23 ranked works

ProvinceBingoEraGenko (1321–1324)PeriodKamakuraSchoolMihara>Ko-MiharaTraditionYamato-denGeneration1stFujishiroJo-jo sakuToko Taikan750(top 15%)TypeSwordsmithCodeSUK181
3Jūyō Bijutsuhin
20Jūyō Tōken

Overview

Sukekuni is the Kokubunji-group smith of Bingo Province, his career fixed by a run of dated blades that carry the eras Tokuji, Genko, Karyaku, Gentoku and Kenmu, placing him from the close of the period into the years. His is one of the standing province problems of the room. Because even his long signatures cut the province only as Bishu (備州), and the -period swordbooks read that single character as , he was transmitted for centuries as a Kokubunji smith, and the Kokon Meizukushi named him the founder of the Hokke lineage. The published sources now correct this to Bingo for three reasons: late- and Bingo work customarily cut the province as Bishu, with Bingo no appearing only from the period; the Meizukushi Taizen records his residence at Anna Tojo, and the Bingo Kokubunji stood in that Anna district; and the genealogies set this Kokubunji line apart from the group. The recognition of his hand rests not on shape but on the and , for his construction stays orthodox, without the broad and high by which old announces itself.

His hand is best read as one smith working in three registers that the published sources name again and again. The first and most characteristic is a or fine carrying a strong Yamato temperament, and the commentary states it plainly, that 'his style, like that of works, possesses a Yamato temperament' (その作風は三原物などと同じく大和気質がある). Over an that flows and tends to , the grain standing, with adhering and a whitish rising, he tempers a narrow whose frequently frays into , with and entering, and running, and well laid. The -gakari of his steel is the tell that ties him to and holds him apart from the pure of mainstream , and a reverse inclination, the that slants his and toward the base, runs through the temper from his earliest dated work.

The is where his two traditions meet. Across the -toned pieces the steel is an flowing to , the grain raised, with and the whitish of Bingo; but on the -leaning blades the throws up a mottled, -like that the published sources liken to the Unrui group, 'work in a manner with a reflection that calls to mind the Unrui of ' (備前の雲類を想わせるような地斑映りの立つ直刃仕立ての出来). That is the single trait that distinguishes him within the Yamato-influenced Bingo schools. The runs straight to a or finishes in a -toned sweep with , and on the the published sources find a steel of somewhat dark tone, with entering on the better-forged examples.

The third register the commentary names is a somewhat more decorative , a feature it notes is scarcely seen in old . Into the base he mixes , , angular and pointed elements, widening in places to a , the whole running with , and frequent, well laid and appearing, with and within the . The dated works anchor these registers in time: the Genko 3 of 1323 shows the -toned at its clearest, while the rare Karyaku 2 of 1327 carries the hand at small scale. The published sources read the more animated against the school directly, observing that this mixing of many kinds of teeth into a base 'corresponds closely to the Gentoku-dated ' and is 'a stylistic mode showing a -ba scarcely encountered in Ko-'.

What sets him apart from his neighbours is exactly what the judges name. He stands within the Yamato-influenced Bingo orbit beside the old smiths, sharing their and standing , yet held apart from them by the more decorative and by the -like recalling Unrui. The published sources describe his working domain as one 'in which - and Yamato- are intermingled' (備前伝と大和伝が混在した作域), with the characteristics of Kokubunji Sukekuni shown in both and , and for that reason they affirm his many attributions. Even where a piece at first glance recalls Ko-, the commentary takes care to note that the construction differs, being orthodox rather than the broad- shape; of one such it concludes that its appearance, which 'at first glance recalls old , expresses one facet of Sukekuni's style' (一見古三原を思わせる出来は助国の一作風を示したもの).

For the collector Sukekuni is a name encountered seldom and held with care. Fujishiro grades him Jo-jo . He has no National Treasures and no Important Cultural Properties; his record runs instead through the tier, where twenty of his blades are designated, and through the prewar Bijutsuhin, which holds three more, among them the Gentoku 1 and a Karyaku 2 . Signed works are extremely few, most of them , and the published sources call surviving by this smith exceedingly rare, 'examples by this maker in form being exceedingly rare' (同工の短刀での遺例は稀有), so a dated piece is prized as research material. His blades have passed through long-held private collections rather than museums: the Bijutsuhin were held by Saito Makoto and by Takashima Tatsunosuke, and the by Okajima Kichiro, while one Bijutsuhin blade is recorded as having been 'presented as a memento among the belongings of Hirobumi' (伊藤博文公の遺物として贈られたものという). Held mostly in private hands and seldom traded, a signed and dated Kokubunji Sukekuni comes to light only from time to time, a quiet but well-documented witness to the Yamato-influenced swordmaking of late- Bingo.

Kantei

one Bingo Kokubunji hand in three registers the NBTHK names again and again: a Yamato-toned suguha akin to old Mihara, a suguha over a Bizen-Unrui-like jifu utsuri, and a somewhat more decorative chuji-gunome midare, all over an itame flowing to masame with a whitish or jifu utsuri and a saka-inclined ko-nie temper

Sukekuni is the Kokubunji-group smith of Bingo, working from the close of the Kamakura period into the Nanbokucho years, with dated blades surviving across Tokuji, Genko, Karyaku, Gentoku and Kenmu. His name is one of the standing province problems of kanting: because even his long signatures cut the province only as Bishu (備州) and the swordbooks read that as Bizen, he was transmitted from the Edo period as a Bizen Kokubunji smith, and the Kokon Meizukushi makes him the founder of the Hokke lineage. The published sources now correct this to Bingo, since for late-Kamakura and Nanbokucho Bingo work the province was customarily cut as Bishu, and Anna district, where the Bingo Kokubunji stood, is named in the genealogies. The kantei itself rests on a single coherent hand worked in three registers the NBTHK names repeatedly: a strongly Yamato-tempered suguha akin to old Mihara, full of masame-gakari, hotsure and standing grain; a suguha laid over a jifu-like utsuri that recalls the Bizen Unrui group; and a somewhat more decorative midare mixing chuji and gunome. Over an itame that flows to masame with ji-nie and a whitish or jifu-tinged utsuri he sets a suguha-based ko-nie-deki temper that runs saka-gokoro, with frequent ashi and yo, kinsuji and sunagashi, and a nioiguchi that often shizumi. The construction stays orthodox, without the broad shinogi-ji and high shinogi of old Mihara, so the attribution turns on the ji and ha rather than on shape.

Diagnostic discriminators

unique vs old Mihara (shirake-utsuri, no jifu)

Observation by phase

The Yamato-toned suguha akin to old Mihara (his core register)

His core manner is a suguha or fine hoso-suguha read by the published sources as carrying a strong Yamato temperament, like the old Mihara of Bingo. Over an itame that flows and tends to masame, with the grain standing, ji-nie adhering and a whitish utsuri rising, he tempers a narrow suguha whose habuchi frequently frays into hotsure, with ko-ashi and yo, sunagashi and kinsuji running, and ko-nie well laid; the nioiguchi tends to tighten. The boshi runs straight to a small round or finishes in a yakizume-toned sweep with hakikake. The Genko-dated ubu tachi shows this manner at its clearest, a flowing itame to masame with shirake-utsuri and a fine suguha frequently hotsure, while the signed wakizashi carries the same hand at tanto scale. The published sources say outright that his style, like that of Mihara work, possesses a Yamato temperament.

Sugata 姿
Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
Bōshi 帽子

The suguha over a jifu utsuri recalling Bizen Unrui

The second register the published sources name is a suguha-based work whose jihada throws up a jifu-like, mottled utsuri that calls to mind the Unrui group of Bizen. Over a well-packed ko-itame with fine ji-nie, a clear midare-utsuri or a standing irregular utsuri arises, and the temper is a chu-suguha mixed with ko-chuji and ko-gunome, ko-ashi entering, the nioiguchi tightening, bright and clear. The published sources describe his range as one in which Bizen-den and Yamato-den coexist, with the characteristics of Kokubunji Sukekuni shown in both ji and ha. The o-suriage mumei katana attributed to him in this manner show the same well-forged ko-itame and the same midare-utsuri, with a chu-suguha base lit by ko-chuji.

Sugata 姿
Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
Bōshi 帽子

The somewhat more decorative chuji-gunome midare

The third register named by the published sources is a somewhat more decorative midare, a feature they note is scarcely seen in old Mihara: into a suguha base he mixes ko-chuji, gunome, angular and pointed elements, with the temper widening in places to a ko-midare, running saka-gokoro with saka-ashi, ashi and yo frequent, ko-nie well laid and yubashiri appearing, kinsuji and sunagashi within the ha. The Showa-52 tachi is offered as a midareba example with a slightly florid midare scarcely encountered in Ko-Mihara, and the Heisei-16 tachi mixes gunome, ko-chuji, ko-gunome and angular forms into the suguha, the whole running saka-gokoro with saka-ashi, a treatment the published sources connect to his Gentoku-dated Juyo Bijutsuhin tachi. The boshi here runs straight with hakikake to a ko-maru.

Sugata 姿
Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
Bōshi 帽子
Scholarship

The central scholarly question around Sukekuni is the province: because even long signatures cut it only as Bishu (備州), the Edo-period swordbooks read this as Bizen and listed him as Bizen Kokubunji, while the Koto Meizukushi Taizen records a Bizen Kokubunji who resided at Anna Tojo in Bingo. The published sources resolve it for Bingo on three grounds: late-Kamakura and Nanbokucho Bingo work customarily cuts the province as Bishu (Bingo no kuni appears only from Muromachi), the Bingo Kokubunji stood in Anna district, and the genealogies set this Kokubunji line apart from the Mihara group as the Hokke lineage.

The published sources also caution that his hand divides into the three registers, and that on the more orthodox suguha pieces he is read against old Mihara: a Showa-25 tachi is judged a midareba example showing a slightly florid midare scarcely encountered in Ko-Mihara, while several others note that although a suguha piece at first glance recalls Ko-Mihara, the construction differs, being orthodox rather than the broad-shinogi, high-shinogi Mihara shape.

Designations

Kokuhō—
Jūyō Bunkazai—
Jūyō Bijutsuhin3
Gyobutsu—
Tokubetsu Jūyō—
Jūyō Tōken20

Elite Standing

0.17 across 23 designated works

Top 13% among smiths

Provenance

3 documented provenances across certified works by Sukekuni

Provenance Standing

0 works held in elite collections across 3 documented provenances

Top 47% among smiths

Raw score: 2.00 / 10

Blade Forms

Distribution across 23 ranked works

Signatures

Signature types across 23 ranked works

Currently Available

Lineage

Sukekuni
Students (2)
  1. 1.Masaie正家30designated
  2. 2.Kaneyasu兼安12designated

Ko-Mihara School

Other artisans of the Ko-Mihara school

  1. 1.Masahiro正廣1 for sale37designated
  2. 2.Masaie正家30designated
  3. 3.Kaneyasu兼安12designated
  4. 4.Masanobu正信2 for sale4designated
  5. 5.Masamune正宗1designated
  6. 6.Masakiyo政清1designated
  7. 7.Tomoshige共重1designated