NihontoWatch MonNihontoWatchBETA
MarketEncyclopedia
NihontoWatch Mon

NihontoWatchBETA

Market
Encyclopedia
Overview·Kantei·Designations·Provenance·Blade Forms·Signatures·Lineage·School
OverviewKanteiDesignationsProvenanceBlade FormsSignaturesLineageSchool
  1. Schools
  2. Mihara
  3. Ko-Mihara
  4. Masanobu

Ko-Mihara Masanobu

正信

Jūyō
Vol. 13, No. 137 · Tachi

Ko-Mihara Masanobu

正信

4 ranked works

ProvinceBingoEraMeitoku (1390–1394)PeriodMuromachiSchoolMihara>Ko-MiharaTraditionYamato-denTeacherMasaieToko Taikan500(top 26%)TypeSwordsmithCodeMAS689
4Jūyō Tōken

Overview

The fixed point in Masanobu's record is a signed Bishu Masanobu and dated Meitoku 5, that is 1394, the long signature cut in fine chisel strokes on the and the date carried on the reverse. He was a swordsmith of the Ko- school in Bingo Province, working at the close of the period, and a second blade carries the still earlier date of Eiwa 2 (1376), the two dated pieces fixing his activity within the final decades of that age. The published commentary counts him, together with Masaie and Masahiro, among the representative hands of Ko-, and names him with Masamune of the group as one of the smiths in whom 「正宗・正信等はその最後を飾る刀工であろう」, those who adorned the finale of the line. The group arose at the end of the period and flourished down to the close of the period, and the work of its late--through- phase is collectively called Ko-; the strong Yamato temperament of that work is explained by exchange with the Yamato heartland through the many estates of its great temples and shrines, Toji and Rengeo-in among them, that lay within Bingo.

His hand is the school's hand, and it is a quiet one. Over an mixed with and flowing that stands rather than lies flat and runs toward along the edge, he tempers a low, gentle straight temper, a or that here and there carries a shallow and mixes in small and slight rather than working itself up into a true . Along the run , and futae-, the doubled temper line, with small entering and fine and threading through; gathers on the line, and the is tight and inclined to sink rather than to glow, though on the best blades it brightens and clears. The published sources are candid that the temper is subdued in feeling, yet they hold that 「直刃の出来も地味ながら同派の持前をよく示して」, that the , plain as it is, displays the inherent traits of the school well, and that the workmanship is sound throughout. He is a smith read by the restraint and evenness of a straight edge, the small a recurring punctuation along an otherwise still line.

The is where the school marks itself most plainly. The stands, the grain visibly raised, and the steel takes on a bluish-black tone over which a whitish rises; fine adheres, and -like dark lines enter the standing grain, and patchy texture gathers in places. This pale, standing , with the flowing turning to and the gentle, rounded that runs straight with to a or an return, is what the judges have in mind when they read a Yamato temperament throughout work. They put the school manner plainly: compared with Yamato proper the of both and is generally weaker, the stands out and the grain rises, the is conspicuous, the inclines to tighten and the turns back in a calm, rounded form. Masanobu's blades hold to that base almost without exception, the bluish-black steel deeply tasteful and the tight- bright and clear on his finest piece.

His surviving work falls into two registers, and the rarer of them is the one signed. The signed pieces are or only lightly shortened cut with a long Bishu Masanobu signature and an Eiwa or Meitoku date, and they are exceedingly few; signed Masanobu, and especially signed-and-dated examples, were thought from old times to have almost no precedent, so much so that among the -period sword reference books one records 「この太刀のみを載せている」, this alone. One such piece is the unusual construction, which the published sources grant is encountered from time to time in a so strongly touched by Yamato. The larger register is the or blade, with the tending high, on which the folded-back three-character signature or the bare attribution carries his name; it is on these that his work is most often met, and the standing whitish , the and the futae- that he and his school share are what hold them for him. The sword-signature compendia, working from the dated pieces, place his activity in the Eiwa and Meitoku years, securing him within the passage.

What sets him apart is best stated through his own traits rather than against another school. The published commentary, citing the Shinkan Hidensho that appearance 「面ぶり備中太刀に似たり」, resembles , grants that some of his blades read at first glance like the neighboring work; yet it keeps them for , finding that 「鎬高の造り込みや地に現われた白け映り、また刃中の二重刃・喰違刃等に一派の特色を見出し得る」, that in the high- construction, the risen in the , and the futae- and within the the characteristics of the line can be discerned. The futae- is itself a school habit rather than a personal flourish, for the records note that Masanobu has other extant examples showing it and that his fellow smiths Masaie and Masahiro work in the manner. The texts that praise his blades are honest about his individuality: in his work, they say, 「地刃に同工の特色と云うよりも同派の特色が濃く」, the characteristics of the school are stronger in both and than any distinctly personal style, so that he is recognized first as a Ko- hand and only then as Masanobu.

Masanobu is a connoisseur's name rather than a collector's quarry, and the record is honest about its scale. The Toko Taikan values him at a middling figure, and his blades on the official record number four, every one of them at the Important Sword tier; there are no National Treasures, no Important Cultural Properties and no among them. What survives carries provenance of the first order: the Meitoku 5 descended in the Maeda house of the million- domain, its mid- black lacquered mounting still attached, and the was transmitted in the Ii house, lords of the Hikone domain, the published sources calling it 「現存稀な古三原正信の在銘作として資料的にも貴重である」, a rare extant signed work by Ko- Masanobu, precious as documentary material. Most designated blades of this rank are held rather than traded, and a signed and dated Masanobu, of which only a handful survive, reaches the market very rarely indeed; the and pieces are the more findable face of his work, and one appears from time to time, offering the student of the schools a sound, characteristic example of a Bingo Yamato-influenced hand, the kind of grounded blade on which a careful is built.

Kantei

one quiet, Yamato-influenced suguha-cho manner of the Ko-Mihara school, read in two registers: the few ubu or lightly suriage signed pieces bearing the Bishu Masanobu mei with Eiwa or Meitoku dates, and the suriage or orikaeshi-mei blades whose high shinogi and shirake-utsuri keep them for Mihara even where they read at first like neighboring Aoe work

Masanobu of the Ko- school in Bingo Province, active from the close of the era; his two dated signed pieces carry Eiwa 2 (1376) and Meitoku 5 (1394), placing him among the last hands of the old line. The published sources count him, together with Masaie and Masahiro, among the representative smiths of Ko-, and call him the smith who adorned the finale of the group. Signed works are exceedingly rare, so much so that of the -period sword reference books only one records him at all; the Meitoku 5 was for a long time the single recognized example. His hand is the school's: an mixed with and flowing that stands (), the steel carrying , and a whitish , over which he tempers a quiet or with , and futae- (), small and fine and , the tight and tending to sink. The runs straight with to a or return; the on the side, the standing whitish and the gentle rounded announce the Yamato temperament the judges read throughout work. The published commentary notes that his blades, like the school's, can at first glance resemble the neighboring , yet the high , the and the futae- keep them for .

Diagnostic discriminators

100% of his works

the whitish ground is his school marker: over a standing itame that flows to masame the steel whitens and a shirake-utsuri rises, with a bluish-black iron tone; the published sources name this whitish, standing hada and the shirake-utsuri the Mihara ground, distinct from the bright midare-utsuri of mainstream Bizen, and note that in Mihara the nie of both ji and ha is generally weaker than in Yamato proper

75% of his works

100% of his works

Observation by phase

His hand: a quiet Yamato-leaning suguha-cho over a standing, whitish Mihara itame

Over an mixed with and flowing that stands as and runs to on the side, the steel carries fine , and -like dark lines, takes a bluish-black tone and raises a whitish . The is a quiet or , sometimes with a shallow nuance, mixing in small and slight ; , and futae- () appear along the , small enter, and fine and run through, the tight and tending to sink () with , at times bright and clear. The runs straight with , turning back in or with an tendency. The blades are with and a tending high, and one is the unusual ; the published sources note that such Yamato-influenced shapes are encountered from time to time in . Signatures are cut large and bold in thick chisel strokes, reading Bishu Masanobu with an Eiwa or Meitoku date, or folded back as a three-character on pieces.

Sugata 姿
Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
Bōshi 帽子
Suriage and orikaeshi-mei blades that read at first like Aoe, kept for Mihara by the high shinogi and shirake-utsuri— the suriage shinogi-zukuri katana with a folded-back three-character mei, of standard width, deep curvature and ample niku; the published sources cite the Shinkan Hidensho that Mihara work resembles Bitchu tachi in appearance and grant that such a blade reads at first like neighboring Aoe, yet locate the Mihara identity in its high-shinogi construction, the shirake-utsuri in the ji, and the futae-ha and kuichigai-ba within the ha
Signed and dated pieces, Bishu Masanobu, Eiwa and Meitoku years— the rare ubu or lightly suriage tachi cut with a long Bishu Masanobu signature and an Eiwa 2 (1376) or Meitoku 5 (1394) date on the ura; the published sources stress that signed and especially signed-and-dated Masanobu were thought from old times to have almost no precedent, so that among the Edo-period meikan only one records this smith, and the dated pieces fix his activity at the close of Nanbokucho
Scholarship

The published sources place Masanobu, with Masaie and Masahiro, among the representative smiths of Ko-Mihara, and with Masamune of the same group among those who adorned the school's finale; signed examples bearing Eiwa and Meitoku dates fix his activity at the close of the Nanbokucho period.

The records read a pronounced Yamato temperament in Mihara work and explain it by exchange with Yamato through the great temple-and-shrine estates in Bingo; compared with Yamato proper, Mihara is said to show weaker nie in both ji and ha, a forging in which mokume stands and the grain rises, conspicuous shirake-utsuri, a tightened nioiguchi, and a calm rounded boshi.

The published commentary, citing the Shinkan Hidensho that Mihara work resembles Bitchu tachi in appearance, grants that some Ko-Mihara blades read at first like the neighboring Aoe, while keeping the Mihara identity in their high-shinogi construction, their shirake-utsuri, and the nijuba and kuichigai-ba within the ha.

Designations

Kokuhō—
Jūyō Bunkazai—
Jūyō Bijutsuhin—
Gyobutsu—
Tokubetsu Jūyō—
Jūyō Tōken4

Elite Standing

0.02 across 4 designated works

Top 28% among smiths

Provenance

2 documented provenances across certified works by Masanobu

Provenance Standing

2 works held in elite collections across 2 documented provenances

Top 61% among smiths

Raw score: 1.94 / 10

Blade Forms

Distribution across 4 ranked works

Signatures

Signature types across 4 ranked works

Currently Available

Lineage

TeacherMasaie
Masanobu

Ko-Mihara School

Other artisans of the Ko-Mihara school

  1. 1.Masahiro正廣1 for sale37designated
  2. 2.Masaie正家30designated
  3. 3.Sukekuni助國2 for sale23designated
  4. 4.Kaneyasu兼安12designated
  5. 5.Masakiyo政清1designated
  6. 6.Tomoshige共重1designated
  7. 7.Masamune正宗1designated