
井上真改 脇差 特別保存刀剣
SOLD
Tracked across 76 dealers worldwide · price history · sold archive
Enpo (1673-1681)
Specifications
47.8 cm
1.1 cm
3.1 cm
2.1 cm
About the maker
Osaka Shinkai真改
Inoue Shinkai was the second son of the first-generation Izumi no Kami Kunisada, the smith the published sources call the Oya-Kunisada, who carried the Horikawa line down to Osaka and founded the school there. Commonly known as Hachirobei, the son served as his father's daisaku and daimei in the old man's last years, and on succeeding to the house as the second generation he signed, like his father, Izumi no Kami Kunisada. Around Manji 4 (1661) the court granted him the right to cut the chrysanthemum crest on his tangs, and from the eighth month of Kanbun 12 (1672) he changed his name to Shinkai; he died suddenly in the eleventh month of Tenna 2 (1682). The published commentary holds his forging to surpass his father's, and the name he is given is the Osaka Masamune. He is to be kept distinct from the first generation he succeeded: where the father cut the Fujiwara surname, the son prefixed Inoue and omitted Fujiwara, and the pre-rename pieces signed Izumi no Kami Kunisada the collectors gather as the work of Shinkai-Kunisada. The hand the sources return to again and again is a *suguha* one. Over a tightly packed *ko-itame-hada* he tempers a *chu-suguha* that takes on a shallow *notare* tendency, sometimes with a little *gunome* mixed, the *nioi* run especially deep, *ko-nie* thick and well gathered, and through the temper *kinsuji* enter vigorously and *sunagashi* appears. The phrase the commentaries use for the result is that the *nioiguchi* is bright and clear, the *ji* and *ha* alike clear and bright. It is the depth of the *nie* and the brightness of the steel together that the judges single out: a katana of his, they write, displays the extremely tight and refined *jigane* for which he was particularly renowned, in a *suguha* of especially fine quality, with exceptionally deep *nie* and *nioi* and *kinsuji* within. The work the published record describes most often is precisely this restrained, deeply nie-laden straight temper rather than any flamboyant *midareba*. The *jigane* is the foundation of that judgment. His forging is a dense *ko-itame* in which the *ji-nie* adheres thickly and minutely (*mijin*), here and there coarser *ji-nie* rising unevenly, and fine *chikei* enter well, the steel notably clear; this is the celebrated Osaka *jigane*, packed and lustrous. Over it the temper begins with a *suguha yaki-dashi* and develops its shallow *notare*, *ashi* and *yo* entering, the *nioiguchi* deep, with occasional faint *muneyaki* near the *monouchi*. The *boshi* runs straight into a *ko-maru* and sweeps in *hakikake* at the point. The published sources state plainly what this manner amounts to: of all his work, this kind, deep in *nie* and clear in steel, is the one that "most fully shows the beauty of his nie-forged work" (沸出来の作品の美しさを最もよくあらわしている). He is, in their phrase, a master of *nie*. The chronology of his work is read off the signature itself, so that the mei is a dating tell. Before the eighth month of Kanbun 12 he signed Izumi no Kami Kunisada; from that month on he signed the four-character Inoue Shinkai, cut large toward the *mune* on the *omote*, with the chrysanthemum crest and a cursive date on the *ura*. A Juyo katana of Kanbun 10 (1670) still carries the long Izumi no Kami Kunisada signature, while the bulk of the corpus, signed Shinkai and dated through the Enpo years, belongs to his prime. Within that prime the published sources mark out a register apart: the *Go-utsushi*, a deliberate copy after Go Yoshihiro, the Soshu master he most prized. In these the *nie* of *ji* and *ha* run stronger than usual, the *nioi* a stage deeper, the temper widening into a large *notare* that turns angular in places with *o-gunome*, and the *boshi* deepens to a single-sheet *ichimai* manner sweeping long in *hakikake*. The commentary names one such blade "the work he was most skilled at, the Go-utsushi" (彼が最も得意とした郷写し), reading it against "a model, an o-suriage mumei Go katana, that Shinkai copied" (大磨上げ無銘の郷の刀の本歌があり); these are the pieces in which his nie shows to the full, the mastery of *nie* his own province. A separate problem of attribution sits at the edge of the corpus: the mei after the rename was long thought never to carry the Izumi no Kami title, so a katana signed Izumi no Kami Shinkai was held in reserve until research judged it a precious piece from just after the name change. He is placed, in the published record, at the very head of the school beside one other man. Among the Osaka Shinto makers, the sources write, "the two great champions are Sukehiro and Shinkai" (大阪新刀の中の両大関は助広と真改), the former especially remarkable for *nioi*, the latter, Shinkai, particularly outstanding for fine *ko-nie*. His own model he took not from Masamune, despite the epithet, but from Go Yoshihiro, and the manner most fully his is the deep-nie *suguha* and the *Go-utsushi*. The point that most clearly sets him apart from his great colleague is one of temper: where Tsuda Sukehiro founded the billowing *toran-ba*, Shinkai tempers none of it, and the commentaries, when they name the two together, pair them by contrast, his bright *suguha* and shallow *notare* against Sukehiro's *toran*. His own deep-nioi nie work, the sources add, together with Sukehiro's *toran*, exerted a great influence on the swordsmiths who came after. He is *Sai-jo saku* among the makers of his age, and the designation behind his name is heavy: one of his blades is an Important Cultural Property, with four Tokubetsu Juyo and sixty-seven Juyo, seventy-one works in the Tokubetsu Juyo and Juyo tiers in all, and seventy-seven designated works on record. His record is signed throughout, a documented hand and not a mystery: seventy-seven of the official pieces carry his signature. The provenance recorded against them runs through known collectors of the modern era. His Enpo 3 katana once belonged to General Tani Tateki, remembered as a discerning sword-lover of the Meiji and Taisho years; other blades pass through the hands of Ito Yosaburo, Sumiyoshi Asataro, Otomo Tsunetaro, Ito Bun'ichi of Hyogo and the Aoyama family, and one Go-utsushi the published commentary ranks as "next after the example designated an Important Cultural Property" (重要文化財に指定されているものに次ぐ). A private collector may realistically encounter his Tokubetsu Juyo and Juyo blades, of which a fair number survive of recorded whereabouts; but they come to market only rarely, and a signed, dated, kiku-mon Shinkai of the Enpo prime is a landmark when it does.







