NihontoWatch MonNihontoWatchBETA
MarketEncyclopedia
NihontoWatch Mon

NihontoWatchBETA

Market
Encyclopedia
Overview·Kantei·Designations·Provenance·Blade Forms·Signatures
OverviewKanteiDesignationsProvenanceBlade FormsSignatures
  1. Schools
  2. Shizu
  3. Yamato Shizu
  4. Kaneuji

Shizu Kaneuji

包氏

Tokujū
Vol. 24, No. 17 · Katana

Shizu Kaneuji

包氏

17 ranked works

ProvinceYamatoEraEnbun (1356–1361)PeriodNanbokuchōSchoolShizu>Yamato ShizuTraditionYamato-denGeneration2ndFujishiroJo-jo sakuToko Taikan800(top 14%)TypeSwordsmithCodeKAN416
4Tokubetsu Jūyō13Jūyō Tōken

Overview

Kaneuji written 包氏 is the Yamato side of one of the great names of the tradition. The published sources are consistent on the point: 包氏 was the signature that Saburō Kaneuji used while he was resident in Yamato, before he studied under Masamune, changed the first character of his name to 兼, and settled at in Tagi District of Province. Works of that Yamato phase have been called Yamato since antiquity. The term did not stay so narrow. As the 's commentary puts it, even after the master moved to there were smiths who did not follow him but remained in Yamato and succeeded to the 包氏 name into the period, and in the broad sense "such makers too are included under the designation Yamato " (広義にはこれを含めて大和志津と呼称している). 416 gathers both senses under one name, and its workmanship is read throughout as the Yamato base carrying a admixture.

The hand divides into two registers, and the published record draws the line plainly. The first is the signed and dated piece: and , wide in body and somewhat , the thin, with a little , the two-character cut large and fine below the peg-hole. Over an that tends to stand a little, with and , the temper is a or a shallow set with pointed , and entering, well adhered, slight and , with ; one dated Jōji 1 (1362) adds coarse and a , and an Enbun carries a raised and a in its groove. The published sources stress that only a few such signed pieces survive, dated to the Kannō, Jōji and Enbun years, that some run to a -like full temper, and that "the manner of workmanship is not uniform" (作風は一様ではない); they are valued, with their dates, as material for the study of the name.

The second and larger register is the , appraised as Yamato . Here the construction is with a notably high , the somewhat wide, the extended. The flows strongly toward and stands a little, lying thick and entering, one blade adding a -like texture and a faintly blackish steel. The temper rides a or base into which are set linked, round-headed and with pointed ; and enter, the is thick, the shows , and run frequently, and the is bright. The runs straight to a small round, or sweeps into vigorous and to a flame-like form, with carved through the body.

What the commentary names as the tell of the school is precise. The linked, round-headed on a calm -to- base is the trait "that Yamato particularly excelled at within the province" (大和志津が得意としたところ), the feature that separates the school from the plainer mainstream; and over it the -leaning flowing , the high , the edge and the flame-swept are read as the Yamato temperament surfacing within a -toned whole. The judges put it in those terms repeatedly, finding in such blades that "a Yamato temperament is intermingled" (大和気質が混在) and, of one , that "the characteristic -based style associated with 包氏 is clearly expressed in both and " (包氏ののたれの作風の特色). It is a hand at once unmistakably Yamato in bones and in surface.

This double identity carries the central scholarly question around the name, and the published sources do not resolve it so much as record its sides. In the broad reading, 416 is Kaneuji's pre- Yamato self together with the successors who kept his signature at home. One commentary states the opposite directly, that the 包氏 "has no connection with Kaneuji, who migrated from Yamato" (大和から移住した志津兼氏とは関係がない) and is a separate smith of the name, certain not only from the signature compendia but from the surviving blades. Either way the attributions rest on era and school rather than on a single personal mark, and the work is held distinct from purely Yamato pieces, which "differ from the genuine -school manner" (純然たる大和手掻派の作風とは異なり) by their stronger , their and their -tradition flavour. At its finest the manner approaches the celebrated Bunbu , one judged to "call to mind the Bunbu " (名物分部志津をおもわせる).

For the collector this is a -touched Yamato name of real standing rather than of the very first rank. Fujishiro grades the smith Jō-jō . There are no National Treasures and no Important Cultural Properties under the code; the record runs instead through the and tiers, four blades at and thirteen at , seventeen designated works in all. Provenance is genuinely distinguished where it survives: a was the personal sword of Ōmura Masujirō, the Bakumatsu figure remembered as the founder of Japan's modern army; another was held in the Chōfu Mōri family of Nagato; and two of the signed descend from the Makino house, one bestowed by the shogunal family and bearing the gō "Minemuri." The signed and dated pieces are the rarities, only a handful on record and prized as research material; the Yamato come to market from time to time, with patience, a Yamato hand wearing Masamune's influence that a private collector can realistically hope to encounter.

Kantei

two registers of one Yamato hand under the 包氏 name: the ubu, signed and dated sun-nobi tanto and wakizashi, varied in manner and reaching a hitatsura full temper, set against the o-suriage mumei katana judged Yamato Shizu, the Tegai masame base everywhere carrying a Soshu admixture of thick ji-nie, chikei and a flame-swept boshi; behind both stands the scholarly question of whether the Nanbokucho 包氏 is Kaneuji's pre-Mino self, his Yamato successors, or a separate same-name smith

Kaneuji written 包氏 is the Yamato register of the name made famous in Mino. The published sources record that 包氏 was the signature Shizu Saburo Kaneuji used while resident in Yamato, before he studied under Soshu Masamune, changed the first character to 兼, and settled at Shizu in Tagi District of Mino; works of that Yamato phase have been called Yamato Shizu since antiquity. The term was then broadened to include the smiths of the same line who did not follow Kaneuji to Mino but remained in Yamato and inherited the 包氏 signature into the Nanbokucho period, and KAN416 collects both. His work is read as the Yamato Tegai base carrying a Soshu admixture: an itame that flows toward masame with a standing-grain tendency, thick ji-nie and frequent chikei, over which he tempers a calm suguha-to-ko-notare line set with linked round-headed gunome, pointed togariba, frequent sunagashi and kinsuji, the boshi swept into hakikake and often a flame-like sweep. The signed pieces are wide, sun-nobi hira-zukuri tanto and wakizashi, several dated to the Kannin, Joji and Enbun years and not uniform in manner, some running to a hitatsura-like full temper; the mumei attributions are o-suriage katana judged Yamato Shizu from era and school. The published sources call the ji and ha bright and keenly clear, the workmanship at its best brought close to the celebrated meibutsu Bunbu Shizu.

Diagnostic discriminators

unique vs general Yamato Tegai work

unique vs Mino Shizu Kaneuji boshi (notare-komi ko-maru)

unique vs his suguha/ko-notare mumei katana

Observation by phase

The ubu, signed and dated tanto and wakizashi (the research base)

His signed works are ubu hira-zukuri tanto and wakizashi, wide in body, somewhat sun-nobi, the kasane thin, with a little sori. The ground is itame, at times mixed with mokume and packed, tending to stand a little, with ji-nie and chikei. Over it the temper is a gunome-midare or a shallow notare set with pointed togariba, choji-like and ko-notare elements, ko-ashi and yo entering, ko-nie well adhered, slight sunagashi and kinsuji, with tobiyaki; one dated wakizashi adds coarse nie and a kuichigai-ba. The boshi runs midare-komi to a small or large round, or sweeps into hakikake. At the base he carves gomabashi with a koshi-hi, and on one Enbun-dated tanto a raised bonji with a suken. The published sources stress that only a few such pieces survive, dated to the Kannin, Joji and Enbun years, that some run to a hitatsura-like full temper, and that the manner is not uniform; they are valued as research material for the 包氏 name. The signatures are a large two-character mei cut with a fine chisel below the mekugi-ana.

Sugata 姿
Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
Bōshi 帽子

The o-suriage mumei katana judged Yamato Shizu (the mainstream attribution)

The larger face of his record is the o-suriage mumei katana judged Yamato Shizu. These are shinogi-zukuri with a high shinogi, the mihaba somewhat wide, the chu-kissaki extended. The ground is itame that flows strongly toward masame and stands a little, with thick ji-nie and chikei, one Tokubetsu Juyo blade adding a jifu-like texture and a slightly blackish steel. The temper is a suguha or ko-notare base into which he sets linked, round-headed gunome and ko-gunome with pointed togariba, ashi and yo entering, the nie thick, the habuchi showing hotsure, sunagashi and kinsuji frequent, the nioiguchi bright. The boshi runs straight to a small round, or sweeps into vigorous hakikake and nie-kuzure to a flame-like form. The published sources name the linked round-headed gunome as the trait Yamato Shizu particularly excelled at within the province, and read the high shinogi, the edge hotsure and sunagashi, and the flame-swept boshi as the Yamato temperament mixed into the Soshu-toned whole; from these the Yamato Shizu attribution is affirmed. Several are called especially superior examples among works of the group, with bo-hi carved through.

Sugata 姿
Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
Bōshi 帽子
Scholarship

The published sources record that 包氏 originally denotes Shizu Saburo Kaneuji's Yamato phase before he moved to Mino, and that the term Yamato Shizu was broadened to include the line that stayed in Yamato and kept the 包氏 signature into the Nanbokucho period; they stress that only a few signed Nanbokucho tanto survive, dated to the Kannin and Joji eras, some in a hitatsura-like full temper, so the manner is not uniform.

One published account holds the opposite, that the Nanbokucho 包氏 is unrelated to Shizu Kaneuji of the Masamune Jittetsu and is a separate smith of the same name, certain not only from the signature compendia but from extant works, whose o-suriage mumei katana, resembling general Yamato work but emphasizing a nureba temper, is reasonably identified with him.

Designations

Kokuhō—
Jūyō Bunkazai—
Jūyō Bijutsuhin—
Gyobutsu—
Tokubetsu Jūyō4
Jūyō Tōken13

Elite Standing

0.21 across 17 designated works

Top 12% among smiths

Provenance

5 documented provenances across certified works by Kaneuji

Provenance Standing

2 works held in elite collections across 5 documented provenances

Top 62% among smiths

Raw score: 1.93 / 10

Blade Forms

Distribution across 17 ranked works

Signatures

Signature types across 17 ranked works

Currently Available