Moromitsu is recorded in sword reference works as the son of Tomomitsu (also rendered Rinkō) and the father of Morimitsu, placing him squarely within the main lineage during its late florescence. Dated works survive from the Eiwa era (1375) through Oei (1394-1428), establishing an active career spanning roughly three decades at the transition between the and early periods. He stands as one of the representative smiths of the group collectively referred to as the -- makers of blades with comparatively slight curvature -- a stylistic cohort that defined a distinct chapter in production. Reference works further list several generations bearing the name extending into the period, and the question of whether Oei-dated works belong to a second generation remains a subject of ongoing scholarly inquiry.
Moromitsu's technical character is distinguished by a consistently rendered small-pattern aesthetic. His typically presents mixed with , often with a finely standing grain, thick , frequent , and faintly appearing or conspicuous . Upon this forging ground he sets a of mixed with , , and pointed elements, with tendencies appearing here and there and entering well. The temper is characteristically -dominant with , and fine run through. The intermixture of multiple forms, the occasional tendency, and the overall rendering into small-patterned expression well demonstrate the hallmarks of works. In comparison with such contemporaries as Morimitsu and Yasumitsu, his manner is more subdued, and a number of his retain the classic silhouette of with pronounced and or compact . His can be strongly , showing a blue-black tonal cast, and his forging is characteristically bright and clear.
Within Moromitsu's oeuvre, the finest examples display a varied range of while maintaining a high degree of completeness, with full and rounded and and that are in every respect. Several blades carry rare date inscriptions -- Eitoku 1 (1381) and Shitoku 1 (1384) among them -- that are precious as documentary material. His production also includes uncommon forms such as , of which examples are notably scarce in any period. As an preserved with original , his signed works constitute valuable source material for research into the smiths of the late and early eras, and the features of his signature share points in common with other works of the Oei era, further enriching the documentary record of the tradition.