NihontoWatch MonNihontoWatchBETA
MarketEncyclopedia
NihontoWatch Mon

NihontoWatchBETA

Market
Encyclopedia
Overview·Kantei·Designations·Provenance·Blade Forms·Signatures·School
OverviewKanteiDesignationsProvenanceBlade FormsSignaturesSchool
  1. Schools
  2. Miike
  3. Mitsuyo

Miike Mitsuyo

光世

Jūyō
Vol. 13, No. 153 · Katana

Miike Mitsuyo

光世

5 ranked works

ProvinceChikugoEraEinin (1293–1299)PeriodKamakuraSchoolMiikeTraditionWakimonoToko Taikan700(top 17%)TypeSwordsmithCodeMIT336
2Jūyō Bunkazai
3Jūyō Tōken

Overview

Mitsuyo of Miike heads one of the great names of Chikugo, and the published sources fix his standing in a single sentence: the founder, Denta Mitsuyo, is a renowned master of the late period whose representative work is the Ōdenta of the Maeda house, one of the Tenka-goken, the five most celebrated swords of Japan. The descriptions are equally plain about how little of his own hand survives. Among authentically signed work, they state, 'none exists today apart from the single Ōdenta' (現存する有銘作は名物大典太一口よりなく), the later blades cut with the Mitsuyo signature being the work of smiths who inherited the name. So the name is the lineage. Mitsuyo was not one man but a succession, the signature borne from the period into the , and the designated work that comes down to us is read by the as the school manner carried intact rather than as the founder's own blades. The smith stands, in consequence, in a rare double light: a maker famous for one unrepeatable masterpiece, the Ōdenta, and at the time the head of a recognizable Kyūshū hand traced across three centuries of inherited work.

That hand is a flowing, soft-looking manner the published sources hold to a quiet register. Over an mixed with that flows and stands somewhat, adhering, the descriptions linger longest on the itself, calling it a surface 'sticky and, in a sense, very soft to the eye' (ねっとりとして如何にも軟らかそうに見える肌合), one that inclines toward a whitish tone with a rising on the broader blades. The temper is built on : a slender, fine on the work and a carrying on the , adhering well, with and and, in places, , and . The published sources note that even where the is otherwise bright the tends to settle, describing it as a temper 'whose takes on a subdued cast' (匂口が沈みごころとなる刃文). Against this restrained and , the one feature the descriptions single out as the school's own is the carving, and they return to it as the surest mark of the name.

The is the grand early figure the school is known for, a broad , , wide in and wide in the , of moderate with a deep and a compact ; on the longest surviving examples it has been shortened to an , the original signature lost and the attribution carried instead by an inlaid name on the shortened . Across the forging the runs conspicuously, the published record describing a steel in which 'the flows abundantly with adhering' (板目がさかんに流れて地沸つき) before it settles into that soft, whitish . The runs straight and turns in a calm , or on one it tempers to a with a slight . On both faces the carving is a wide run as kaki-nagashi, with an accompanying on the , and it is here that the descriptions locate the school's individuality, writing that 'a personality of the line can be discerned in its preference for carving wide, comparatively shallow ' (幅広で比較的浅い棒樋を好んで掻くところに一派の個性が窺われる).

Because the name spans three centuries, the published sources order the work not by date but by manner and by the attesting inscription. The surviving designated , the descriptions are careful to say, do not date back as far as the late ; yet their , and carving display the school's characteristics, so that the attestations upon them are judged sound and the blades placed broadly at the end of the period. Those attestations are themselves part of the record. One bears a gold-inlaid Mitsuyo that the descriptions read as an authentication 'by such authorities as Kōchū' (本阿弥光忠などの極めと鑑せられる); another carries a large gold-powder Miike Mitsuyo and a red notation that the house valued it, in 1, at seven of gold, the descriptions affirming that 'the gold-powder attestation is appropriate' (金粉銘の極めは妥当). The signed , a wide piece with a boldly cut two-character signature, the calls 'sound, the workmanship in both and good' (健全で地刃の出来がよい). The whole make, founder and successors alike, the descriptions trace to the Ōdenta and class as 'common to early Kyūshū work' (九州古作に共通するもの).

What sets the Miike hand apart from the schools its quiet might otherwise suggest is the and the groove. A measured in belongs to several traditions, and on the alone a Yamashiro or blade keeps a clear, bright steel; the Miike instead whitens and softens into the , sticky character the published sources name, so that the soft and the wide shallow together pull the work back to Chikugo. The descriptions read the line as part of the broad family of early Kyūshū smiths, founded by Denta Mitsuyo rather than descending from a named teacher, its inheritance visible less in the founder's own blades, of which only the Ōdenta is known, than in the unbroken transmission of the name and its traits.

For the collector the reckoning follows from the rarity of the founder and the scattering of the name. Mitsuyo carries no National Treasure within reach and a heavy weight of designation around the one that stands above all: the Ōdenta is the founder's representative work, 'known as the representative piece, transmitted in the Maeda house' (前田家伝来の「名物大典太」が代表作として知られる), and it is patrimony, never offered. Two Important Cultural Properties carry the name in public and sacred keeping rather than on the market, among them the Sohaya-no-tsurugi, a blade of Tokugawa Ieyasu held at the Kunōzan Tōshōgū, and a preserved at Honmyō-. Of the blades that survive in the wider record, one signed is held in the Seikadō Bunko Art Museum and a in the Tokyo National Museum, so that most of his work, like the Ōdenta, is gathered into shrines, temples and long-standing collections. Behind these stand the three blades in the tier that the papers attest, a small number of recorded whereabouts, of which a privately held Mitsuyo is among the rarer things a collector could hope to encounter, coming to market only seldom and as a landmark when it does. He is the Chikugo master known to the world through one unrepeatable treasure, and recognized, wherever the name was carried, by a soft whitish and a wide shallow groove.

Kantei

not a dated chronology but a single transmitted manner with two faces: the founder Denta Mitsuyo of late Heian, head of the name and maker of the Odenta, whose only surviving signed work is that one blade; and the body of extant designated work, ground-down o-suriage katana and a signed wakizashi from the late Kamakura end of the name, which the texts attest by Hon'ami kiwame and read as carrying the school's traits intact. The NBTHK orders these by mei-form and by the kiwame, not by date, since the name spans three centuries and the founder's hand cannot be isolated from his successors' beyond the Odenta itself.

Mitsuyo of Miike in Chikugo heads one of the great names of Kyushu: the published sources call the founder Denta Mitsuyo a renowned master of the late Heian period, and his representative work is the Meibutsu Odenta of the Maeda house, one of the Tenka-goken. The name was not one man alone; it was borne in succession from the Kamakura period into the Muromachi, and among signed works the texts say none survives from the founder himself save the Odenta. The extant designated blades read as a single school manner the NBTHK traces from the Odenta onward and calls common to early Kyushu work: a flowing itame mixed with mokume that stands somewhat and takes ji-nie, a jigane with a slightly sticky, soft-looking surface inclining to a whitish shirake tone, a suguha-based temper in ko-nie-deki with hotsure and kuichigai-ba and a nioiguchi tending to sink, and the school's own individuality in its preference for carving wide, comparatively shallow bo-hi. The build is a grand koshizori shinogi-zukuri tachi, broad in mihaba and shinogi, ground down on the surviving examples to o-suriage katana that the Hon'ami house attested by gold-inlaid and gold-powder kiwame.

Diagnostic discriminators

33% of his works

67% of his works

67% of his works

Observation by phase

The Miike manner of the extant work (the late-Kamakura name, attested by Hon'ami kiwame)

the surviving designated blades all bear an attestational mei rather than an original founder signature: a gold-inlaid Mitsuyo read as a kiwame by such authorities as Hon'ami Kochu, a large gold-powder Miike Mitsuyo with a red origami of Kanbun 1 valued by Hon'ami Koon at seven mai, and one boldly cut two-character signature on a wide hira-zukuri wakizashi; the texts read all as late-Kamakura name-bearing work carrying the school traits

The standard surviving piece is a shinogi-zukuri katana, iori-mune, wide in mihaba and shinogi, of moderate kasane with a deep koshizori and a compact chu-kissaki, ground down on the longest examples to an o-suriage nakago that the Hon'ami house attested. Over it the forging is itame mixed with mokume that flows and stands somewhat, ji-nie adhering, and the texts dwell on the jigane itself, a slightly sticky, soft-looking surface that inclines toward a whitish tone, the shirake-utsuri rising on the broad pieces. The temper is built on suguha, slender on the wakizashi and a chu-suguha with ko-gunome mixed on the katana, ko-nie adhering well, with sunagashi and yo and in places nijuba, hotsure and kuichigai-ba, the published sources noting that the nioiguchi tends toward a subdued cast even where it is otherwise bright and clear. The boshi runs straight and forms a ko-maru or, on one katana, a yakizume, with slight hakikake. On both faces the carving is a wide bo-hi run as kaki-nagashi, with a soe-hi on the wakizashi, the broad and comparatively shallow groove the texts name as the school's own mark. The whole make is the early-Kyushu manner the NBTHK derives from the Odenta: flowing, somewhat soft in the ji, restrained in the ha, and individual in its carving.

Sugata 姿
Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
中直刃
Bōshi 帽子

Denta Mitsuyo, the late-Heian founder and the Odenta

the founder's hand survives in scholarship and in one named blade rather than in the designated corpus: the published sources name Denta Mitsuyo a celebrated late-Heian master whose representative work is the Meibutsu Odenta of the Maeda house, and state that among authentically signed works none is known today apart from that single blade, the later Mitsuyo-signed pieces being the work of successors who inherited the name

The published sources place the founder, Denta Mitsuyo, in the late Heian period and make him head of a school of smiths resident in the Miike district of Chikugo, the same name borne in succession from the Kamakura period into the Muromachi. His representative work is the Meibutsu Odenta, transmitted in the Maeda house and counted among the Tenka-goken, the five most celebrated swords. The texts are explicit on the rarity of his own hand: of authentically signed work none is known today save that one blade, so that the founder is read through the Odenta and through the school manner his successors carried. From the Odenta onward, the NBTHK writes, the Miike style shows traits common to early Kyushu work, a conspicuously flowing itame with ji-nie and a soft, sticky-looking surface, a predominantly suguha temper in ko-nie-deki tending to hotsure and a sinking nioiguchi, and the wide, shallow bo-hi that marks the school. The surviving designated katana, the texts judge, do not date back as far as the late Heian, yet their ji, ha and carving display exactly these characteristics, and the Hon'ami kiwame upon them is appraised as appropriate.

Jigane 地鉄
Hamon 刃文
Scholarship

The published sources frame the school by its origin: Miike denotes a body of smiths resident in the Miike district of Chikugo, founded by the late-Heian master Denta Mitsuyo and carried under the same name from the Kamakura period into the Muromachi.

The texts state plainly that the founder's own signed work is all but lost: among authentically signed pieces none is known today apart from the single Odenta, the later Mitsuyo-signed blades being the work of successors who inherited the name.

The surviving designated katana, the published sources judge, do not date as far back as the late Heian, yet their jihada, hamon and carving display the school's characteristics, so that the gold-powder and gold-inlaid kiwame upon them are appraised as appropriate and the work dated broadly to around the end of the Kamakura period.

Designations

Kokuhō—
Jūyō Bunkazai2
Jūyō Bijutsuhin—
Gyobutsu—
Tokubetsu Jūyō—
Jūyō Tōken3

Elite Standing

0.02 across 5 designated works

Top 28% among smiths

Provenance

1 documented provenance across certified works by Mitsuyo

Provenance Standing

1 works held in elite collections across 1 documented provenances

Top 89% among smiths

Raw score: 1.80 / 10

Blade Forms

Distribution across 5 ranked works

Signatures

Signature types across 5 ranked works

Currently Available

Miike School

Other artisans of the Miike school

  1. 1.Mitsuyo光世1 for sale1designated
  2. 2.Mitsuyo光世2designated
  3. 3.Mitsuyo光世4designated